Re: [Crm-sig] Relation between E28 Conceptual Object and E74 Group

nds to push the documentation > into structuralism. Structuralism is well suited as a basis for many things, > but not all. Many cultural phenomena are better documented by free text > essays. > > Best, > Christian-Emil > > From: Crm-sig on behalf of Franco Niccolucci

Re: [Crm-sig] Relation between E28 Conceptual Object and E74 Group

is compatible with existing international human rights >>> instruments, as well as with the requirements of mutual respect among >>> communities, groups and individuals, and of sustainable development. >>> >>> 2. The “intangible cultural heritage”, as defined in p

[Crm-sig] Relation between E28 Conceptual Object and E74 Group

In the UNESCO List of World Intangible Heritage many items (= E28 Conceptual Object) are referred to specific gatherings of people - commonly named “communities” in everyday's language - such as: Tango -> Argentina & Uruguay Rebetiko -> Greece Opera dei pupi (puppet theatre) -> Italy (Sicily)

Re: [Crm-sig] issue 597: define irreflexivity and asymmetry

Dear Christian-Emile two quick comments. 1) In the discursive parts, probably you swapped the examples: > 1) A relation R is asymmetric if there are no pair x,y such that x relates > to y and at the same time y relates to x. 'less than' (<) is a good example > of an irreflexive relation. >

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 510 --HW

Can somebody kill this flow of spam? Correctly set automatic answer systems should not reply to lists, but perhaps list masters could ban those who don’t. otherwise I will need to set ALL incoming SIG emails to spam to avoid having more leave-of-absence notice by this guy Best wishes to all

[Crm-sig] more on explanations

Sorry, I hit “send” too early. Add to my previous comments the following ones. In the third and fourth bullet points, collections are addressed. But the third point considers “cultural heritage collections” and the fourth “museum collections”, actually in the same copy-paste sentence. Is this

[Crm-sig] a (very minor) note

With other colleagues, I am translating into Italian the CIDOC CRM documentation. This forced me to (or if you prefer, it gave me the opportunity of) reading it with great attention to minute details. On page 10 of the Introduction I found a couple of things that may need to be changed: both

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling a simulated view on a physical space

Dear Martin, Florian, a nice problem indeed. Just to add complication, it seems to me that this is just a special case of determining the viewpoint from which an artist or a photographer produced an image of a landscape, a monument or other landmark. Florian's reverse engineering process

Re: [Crm-sig] CRMSci O19 Property Labels Minor Correction?

Dear George, all “during” sounds fine. In my opinion, not because “at” is locative and implies a place, which is not true: see e.g. "at present", "at midnight", "at some point in time". But because it implies precision, an exact point in time, at the time granularity level assumed, so that

Re: [Crm-sig] HW 496 - Recommending Types

Dear Robert dealing with vocabularies, we noticed (in ARIADNE) that named time periods may have some ambiguity as the same name may refer to different time spans depending on the location. It is a well-known fact firstly evidenced in the ARENA project with an interesting comparative diagram

Re: [Crm-sig] Relationship CRMDig & PREMIS OWL

Dear Miel the project PARTHENOS has developed a CRM-compliant extension of CRMdig which could be useful for you, called the PARTHENOS Entity Model (PEM). It adds several useful entities such as Project, Service, Software etc. further developing and specializing concepts already defined in

Re: [Crm-sig] 511 e-vote

and you may have noticed that I did not vote - I just wanted to stimulate reflection, and I will not bore you anymore. I will reply Martin directly. Franco Prof. Franco Niccolucci Director, VAST-LAB PIN - U. of Florence Scientific Coordinator ARIADNEplus Technology Director 4CH Editor-in-Chief

Re: [Crm-sig] 511 e-vote

I strongly agree with Francesco. Some time ago I wrote a paper about reliability assessment, suggesting that it could be considered a sort of measurement, perhaps a subclass of E16. It was not a proposal for the CRM SIG, just considerations about the fact that at present there is no

Re: [Crm-sig] CRM translation working group

language, > while the protocols and guidelines for translation are arranged in the > working group. > > Best, > Sakiko Kawabe > National Museum of Japanese History > > 2021年3月9日(火) 20:38 Franco Niccolucci via Crm-sig : > Hi George > > you proposed the issue

Re: [Crm-sig] CRM translation working group

Hi George you proposed the issue, so you are expected to coordinate the team :) Meanwhile, I sent out a circular letter about the CRM translation into Italian and already got (overnight!) enough qualified volunteers to start the job. So let’s go! Franco Prof. Franco Niccolucci Director,

[Crm-sig] CRM translation working group

Please count me in Franco Prof. Franco Niccolucci Director, VAST-LAB PIN - U. of Florence Scientific Coordinator ARIADNEplus Technology Director 4CH Editor-in-Chief ACM Journal of Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) Piazza Ciardi 25 59100 Prato, Italy