Re: [Crm-sig] More .1 Questions CRMArchaeo

2022-03-29 Thread Zoe Schubert via Crm-sig
Vielen Dank für die Nachricht! Ich bin am ersten Werktag nach dem 15.04. wieder erreichbar. Die Nachricht wird nicht weitergeleitet. Mit besten Grüßen Zoe Schubert Am 23.03.2022 um 18:07 schrieb Martin Doerr via Crm-sig : > Dear George, > > Please send an issue to the list. We need a policy

Re: [Crm-sig] More .1 Questions CRMArchaeo

2022-03-29 Thread Zoe Schubert via Crm-sig
Vielen Dank für die Nachricht! Ich bin am ersten Werktag nach dem 15.04. wieder erreichbar. Die Nachricht wird nicht weitergeleitet. Mit besten Grüßen Zoe Schubert Am 23.03.2022 um 14:24 schrieb George Bruseker via Crm-sig : > Dear all, > > I am also wondering about implementing .1

Re: [Crm-sig] More .1 Questions CRMArchaeo

2022-03-23 Thread Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
Dear George, Please send an issue to the list. We need a policy for all extensions. Best, Martin On 3/23/2022 3:24 PM, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote: Dear all, I am also wondering about implementing .1 constructs in CRM Archaeo. Although CRM Archaeo declares .1 properties that are

[Crm-sig] More .1 Questions CRMArchaeo

2022-03-23 Thread George Bruseker via Crm-sig
Dear all, I am also wondering about implementing .1 constructs in CRM Archaeo. Although CRM Archaeo declares .1 properties that are actually essential to its implementation, those properties are not (I believe) expressed in the RDF that comes with CRM Archaeo. Is there a hidden PC file for CRM