[Crm-sig] Berlin SIG Attendance Confirmation 27-30 Nov, 2018

2018-11-06 Thread George Bruseker
Dear all, The dates for Berlin are, of course, set, and we already have a doodle where people have indicated their availability/attendance. If you are planning to come to the SIG and you have not filled this out yet, please take a moment to click in what days you will be there. Best, George

[Crm-sig] Issue 383 Homework

2018-11-06 Thread Martin Doerr
Dear All, I had sent the below as new issue, but it is indeed the answer to Issue 383. The question is, how to deal with a file, which is more specific in content, such as an MS Word, but represents the character sequence that defines the content of the respective E90. Is is "is incorporated

[Crm-sig] CRMarcheo

2018-11-06 Thread Christian-Emil Smith Ore
Dear all, I am working on a mapping from Norwegian excavation databases to CRM/CRMarcheo. The sets use relations like over/under between layers and other A8 Stratigraphic Units. A question: Can a find be modeled as an instance of A11 and what about a modern drainage pipe/ditch? Best,

Re: [Crm-sig] CRMarcheo Typos

2018-11-06 Thread Christian-Emil Smith Ore
Sorry for the typos and generally confusing text. Here is a hopefully a better text: AP11 has physical relation (is physical relation of) Domain: A8 Stratigraphic Unit Range: A8 Stratigraphic Unit My issue was about finds as objects. That, how do one model physical relations between finds

Re: [Crm-sig] CRMarcheo Typos

2018-11-06 Thread Martin Doerr
Dear Christian-Emil Achille may know better, but finds are described as objects embedded in Stratigraphic Units (A7 Embedding). Best, Martin On 11/6/2018 7:55 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore wrote: Sorry for the typos and generally confusing text. Here is a hopefully  a better text: