Re: [Crm-sig] error in RDFS for 7.1.1 for the class that is a subclass of E41 and E33

2022-11-10 Thread Gordon Dunsire via Crm-sig
All   A librarian expresses an initial opinion:   What about gender of a name? E.g. "Gordon" is male; "Gordana" is female. The Library of Congress has only recently stopped assigning gender to the referant of a name, which has

Re: [Crm-sig] error in RDFS for 7.1.1 for the class that is a subclass of E41 and E33

2022-11-10 Thread Robert Sanderson via Crm-sig
Hi Martin, No one is proposing anything other than P72. Please stop creating issues where none exist :) "The Big Apple" is a name for the Place which is also known as "New York City". Does anyone disagree that "The Big Apple" is in English with the precise semantics of P72, or that it is not a

Re: [Crm-sig] error in RDFS for 7.1.1 for the class that is a subclass of E41 and E33

2022-11-10 Thread Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
Dear Gordon, "The Library of Congress has only recently stopped assigning gender to the referant of a name", That is interesting! I'd kindly ask for your expert opinion, about the "language" of a name. We had introduced the language property of a title because of the frequent cases of

Re: [Crm-sig] error in RDFS for 7.1.1 for the class that is a subclass of E41 and E33

2022-11-10 Thread George Bruseker via Crm-sig
I agree. This is p72: This property associates an instance(s) of E33 Linguistic Object with an instance of E56 Language in which it is, at least partially, expressed. A mountain is surely made of a molehill here. Can a name be expressed in a language? Yes. Can someone and recognize this and

Re: [Crm-sig] error in RDFS for 7.1.1 for the class that is a subclass of E41 and E33

2022-11-10 Thread Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
Hi Robert, No questions the existence of names with a language. I do not remember doing that. I simply try, as often, to teach the group principles. The scope note for E41 explicitly says: "Different languages may use different appellations for the same thing, such as the names of major

Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Delete E35 Title

2022-11-10 Thread athinak via Crm-sig
Dear all, I follow up this comment with the information that the issue is 340 (apart from 533 for E34) and the minutes is from 44th crm-sig meeting. For me, the formulation of the CRM issues list is very important and helpful to such questions arising regarding the standard. BRs Athina On