Dear All,
Thank you very much for the contributions. I'll try to reformulate the
next days.
On one side, it is very difficult to have general properties of outcomes
of events and activities. So, on this side I do not see easy progress to
be made. We have to see case-by case. On the other
Dear all,
I forward on behalf of Melanie an invitation to dinner this evening:
Like I said yesterday, I will be delighted to hold a get-together for the SIG
people (group) tonight at my ridiculously huge place. Unfortunately I don’t
have access to everyone’s email address as I can’t access my
Dear all,
I was wondering if there was some reasons why the range of the relation "P48
has preferred identifier” is set to E42 Identifier and not to its superclass
E41 Appellation.
If the range of P48 would be set to E41 it would be way easier to disambiguate
between diverse appellations
On 5/23/2018 3:00 PM, Bekiari Xrysoula wrote:
issue 275: Martin will provide a name for .1 property of the PXX
approximates by tommorow
PXX is approximated by
PXX.1 has type: E55 Type
Scope Note: This property of the property /PXX is approximated by/
describes the kind of relationship
Dear all,
please note the SIG meeting will take place in these following rooms on
Thursday and Friday (same location):
* Thursday 24th May 9h30-17h30: *Salle 410
*
o 4th floor. Take the lift at your right in the lobby then on the
right when leaving and cross the level to the
At this link you will find the latest version of the IFLA LRM model definition
https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/ifla-lrm-august-2017_rev201712.pdf?
Pat Riva
Associate University Librarian, Collection Services
Concordia University
Vanier Library (VL-301-61)
7141
