Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 347 Dimension

Dear Robert, On 11/15/2018 8:11 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote: Some scoping questions, that might be obvious or might help clarify the discussion… The National Fire Protection Association is responsible for the safety diamond, that has Health (blue), Flammable (red) and Reactivity (yellow)

[Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings

Dear All, I would expect that the library or archival community do have a good practice how to "squeeze" a compound name, such as : "His Majesty Dr. Snoopy Hickup Miller Jr", with respective separators, in a machine readable string, that could be used as custom datatype in an rdfs:Literal as

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149

Yes G -- Dr. George Bruseker Coordinator Centre for Cultural Informatics Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) Science and Technology Park of Crete Vassilika Vouton, P.O.Box 1385, GR-711 10

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 345, P59 needs change

Yes G -- Dr. George Bruseker Coordinator Centre for Cultural Informatics Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) Science and Technology Park of Crete Vassilika Vouton, P.O.Box 1385, GR-711 10

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149

Yes G -- Dr. George Bruseker Coordinator Centre for Cultural Informatics Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) Science and Technology Park of Crete Vassilika Vouton, P.O.Box 1385, GR-711 10

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345)

Yes G -- Dr. George Bruseker Coordinator Centre for Cultural Informatics Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) Science and Technology Park of Crete Vassilika Vouton, P.O.Box 1385, GR-711 10

[Crm-sig] Fwd: Re: Issue 383 Homework, addition

Dear All, Continuing the question from my last message below: Very large strings one would normally describe in a file and instantiate E90 Symbolic Object or a subclass of it with the URL. However, the question is, if the URL would indeed be a good persistent identifier, since the URL stands

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149

Yes. Øyvind > Am 15.11.2018 um 15:15 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > > Since E75 Conceptual Object Appellation has been deprecated, we have to > deprecate P149 as well: > > P149 is identified by (identifies) > > Domain: E28 Conceptual > Object > > Range:

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 345, P59 needs change

This looks good to me. Øyvind > Am 15.11.2018 um 15:43 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > > Since E46 Section Definition has been deprecated, we need to change the scope > note of P59: > > P59 has section (is located on or within) > > Domain: E18 Physical Thing > > Range:

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345)

Yes. Øyvind > Am 15.11.2018 um 15:24 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > > Since E46 Section Definition has been deprecated, we have to deprecate P58 as > well: > > P58 has section definition (defines section) > Domain: E18 Physical Thing > Range:E46 Section

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149

Yes Pierre On Thu 15 Nov 2018 at 18:47 Robert Sanderson < Robert Sanderson ( Robert Sanderson ) > wrote: > > > > > > > >   > > > > > > > > YES. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   > > > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   > > > >

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 347 Dimension

Some scoping questions, that might be obvious or might help clarify the discussion… The National Fire Protection Association is responsible for the safety diamond, that has Health (blue), Flammable (red) and Reactivity (yellow) ratings for the sample or area, each of which is measured from

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149

YES. Rob From: Crm-sig on behalf of Martin Doerr Date: Thursday, November 15, 2018 at 7:15 AM To: crm-sig Subject: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149 Dear All, Since E75 Conceptual Object Appellation has been deprecated, we have to deprecate P149 as well: P149 is identified by

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345)

YES A. > Il giorno 15 nov 2018, alle ore 15:24, Martin Doerr ha > scritto: > > Dear All, > > Since E46 Section Definition has been deprecated, we have to deprecate P58 as > well: > > P58 has section definition (defines section) > Domain: E18 Physical Thing > Range:

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 345, P59 needs change

New scope note looks great. Rob From: Crm-sig on behalf of Martin Doerr Date: Thursday, November 15, 2018 at 7:43 AM To: crm-sig Subject: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 345, P59 needs change Dear All, Since E46 Section Definition has been deprecated, we need to change the scope note of P59: P59 has

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149

YES for me A. > Il giorno 15 nov 2018, alle ore 15:15, Martin Doerr ha > scritto: > > Dear All, > > Since E75 Conceptual Object Appellation has been deprecated, we have to > deprecate P149 as well: > > P149 is identified by (identifies) > > Domain: E28 Conceptual > Object >

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345)

YES Thanks Martin! Rob From: Crm-sig on behalf of Martin Doerr Date: Thursday, November 15, 2018 at 7:24 AM To: crm-sig Subject: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345) Dear All, Since E46 Section Definition has been deprecated, we have to deprecate P58 as well: P58 has

[Crm-sig] provisional agenda

Dear All You may find a draft agenda for the forthcoming meeting in the link http://www.cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/provisional%20agenda%20_0.pdf. Please send us any comment you may have. best regards Chryssoula --

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345)

Yes Richard On 15/11/2018 14:24, Martin Doerr wrote: Dear All, Since E46 Section Definition has been deprecated, we have to deprecate P58 as well: P58 has section definition (defines section) Domain: E18 Physical Thing Range:E46 Section Definition Quantification:

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149

Yes. Richard On 15/11/2018 14:15, Martin Doerr wrote: Dear All, Since E75 Conceptual Object Appellation has been deprecated, we have to deprecate P149 as well: P149 is identified by (identifies) Domain: E28 Conceptual Object Range:E75 Conceptual Object

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149

YES Stephen Stead Tel +44 20 8668 3075 Mob +44 7802 755 013 E-mail ste...@paveprime.com LinkedIn Profile https://www.linkedin.com/in/steads/ From: Crm-sig On Behalf Of Martin Doerr Sent: 15 November 2018 14:16 To: crm-sig Subject: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345)

I agree Stephen Stead Tel +44 20 8668 3075 Mob +44 7802 755 013 E-mail ste...@paveprime.com LinkedIn Profile https://www.linkedin.com/in/steads/ From: Crm-sig On Behalf Of Martin Doerr Sent: 15 November 2018 14:25 To: crm-sig Subject: [Crm-sig] PLEASE

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345)

YES Phil Carlisle Interim Listing Information Manager Listing Group, Historic England Direct Dial: +44 (0)1793 414824 http://thesaurus.historicengland.org.uk/ http://www.heritagedata.org/blog/ Listing Information Services fosters an environment where colleagues are valued for their skills and

[Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345)

Dear All, Since E46 Section Definition has been deprecated, we have to deprecate P58 as well: P58 has section definition (defines section) Domain: E18 <#_E18_Physical_Thing> Physical Thing Range: E46 <#_E46_Section_Definition> Section Definition Quantification:    one to many, dependent,

[Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149

Dear All, Since E75 Conceptual Object Appellation has been deprecated, we have to deprecate P149 as well: P149 is identified by (identifies) Domain: E28 <#_E28_Conceptual_Object> Conceptual Object Range: E75 <#_E75_Conceptual_Object> Conceptual Object Appellation Subproperty of: E1

[Crm-sig] Issue 347 Dimension

Dear All, Here my homework! ISSUE 347 The sig discussedMartin's proposal about the relaxation of definition of E54 to either representing the approximation of a true quantity of a thing or phenomenon provided by a measurementor a derived quantity computed indirectly from observation