Dear All,
I vote VETO.
Reason: The proposed scope note for R67 will still contain: "conceived
at some point in time to form together a logical whole". This means to
my opinion, that by deprecating R10, an instance of Work cannot evolve
over time into some subsets that, following one group of
I vote YES
Pierre
On Mon, Apr 4th, 2022 at 5:08 AM, Pat Riva via Crm-sig
wrote:
>
> Hello all yet again!
>
>
>
>
> Property R10 (
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GgfF8Mi6EAduLyCBH9MZq4uSOX3C4sftnlKHUG-huWI/edit?usp=sharing
> ) has member (is member of) was discussed in October
Dear all,
The result of this e-vote is
8 yes
0 no
0 veto
Best,
Christian-Emil
From: Christian-Emil Smith Ore
Sent: 21 March 2022 12:24
To: crm-sig
Subject: E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)
Dear all,
As the issue number indicates
