Yes, thank you Robert for spotting it.
Mélanie.
De :"George Bruseker"
A : "Martin Doerr"
Cc :crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
Date : 06/04/2019 16:36
Objet : Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE
Envoyé par :"Crm-sig"
YES
On
YES
On 2019-04-05 19:06, Martin Doerr wrote:
Dear All,
It's an oversight indeed!
PLEASE VOTE YES, if you agree with _P189 approximates (is approximated
by)._
Martin
On 4/5/2019 6:51 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
Dear all,
In the 6.2.4 PDF, there isn’t a definition of the inverse property
?yes
Chr-E
From: Crm-sig on behalf of Martin Doerr
Sent: 05 April 2019 18:06
To: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE
Dear All,
It's an oversight indeed!
PLEASE VOTE YES, if you agree with P189
5 April 2019 17:07
To: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE
Dear All,
It's an oversight indeed!
PLEASE VOTE YES, if you agree with P189 approximates (is approximated by).
Martin
On 4/5/2019 6:51 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
YES!
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 7:14 PM Martin Doerr wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> It's an oversight indeed!
>
> PLEASE VOTE YES, if you agree with P189 approximates (is approximated by).
>
> Martin
>
> On 4/5/2019 6:51 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> In the 6.2.4 PDF, there isn’t a
ot;crm-sig@ics.forth.gr"
> Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE
>
> Dear All,
>
> It's an oversight indeed!
>
> PLEASE VOTE YES, if you agree with P189 approximates (is approximated by).
>
> Martin
>
> On 4/5/201
In case it wasn’t obvious, a definite YES from me ☺
Rob
From: Crm-sig on behalf of Martin Doerr
Date: Friday, April 5, 2019 at 9:06 AM
To: "crm-sig@ics.forth.gr"
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE
Dear All,
It's an oversight indeed!
PLEAS
Yes, sounds reasonable to me.
Thanasis
On 05/04/2019 17:06, Martin Doerr wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> It's an oversight indeed!
>
> PLEASE VOTE YES, if you agree with /P189 approximates (is approximated by)./
>
> Martin
>
> On 4/5/2019 6:51 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> In the
Dear All,
It's an oversight indeed!
PLEASE VOTE YES, if you agree with /P189 approximates (is approximated by)./
Martin
On 4/5/2019 6:51 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
Dear all,
In the 6.2.4 PDF, there isn’t a definition of the inverse property of
P189 approximates. One would imagine P189i
