Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

2022-03-21 Thread Hiebel, Gerald via Crm-sig
YES Best, Gerald From: Crm-sig on behalf of Martin Doerr via Crm-sig Reply to: Martin Doerr Date: Monday, 21. March 2022 at 12:44 To: "crm-sig@ics.forth.gr" Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo) TES! Martin On 3/21/2022 1:24 PM, Christian-Emil Smith

[Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

2022-03-21 Thread Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig
Dear all, As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while. In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's proposal to change the quantification of appears in, restricted to, typical for

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

2022-03-21 Thread Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
TES! Martin On 3/21/2022 1:24 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig wrote: Dear all, As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while. In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's