Dear all,
In the context of the homework for this issue I report a bit of
information about way to make statements about triples.
During the last conversation on the issue, I believe we did discuss the
usefulness of formalising a way to talk about named graph. The
conversation was born, if
Dear Thanasis, all,
I would be happy to join the discussion. Another useful reading other
than the already cited ones, is ["Cataloguing Culture: Legacies of
Colonialism in Museum
Documentation”](https://www.ubcpress.ca/cataloguing-culture) by Hannah
Turner.
Regarding the name and the
Dear all,
Normally the link to the description already exists, but they only use
property/classes number and they reflect CIDOC-CRM version 5.0.4
In fact, if you go to
http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P2
you should be able to see an html version of the property description
relative to P2
Dear George,
The namespace to be used should be the `xml:base` value in the RDF
document. Example:
```xml
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#;
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#; xml:lang="en"
xml:base="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/CRMsci/;>
```
```xml
Dear George, all,
As Martin pointed out CRMtext surely provide a solutions (there is
indeed a class transcription), however in the past I found myself using
the same modelling that Rob proposed (using P2 instead of P32 on the
activity node)
Best,
Nicola
--
Nicola Carboni
Visual
