I would also like to be involved in this discussion, please! I too
have a reading list on the subject that I would be happy to share; I
have been meaning to pull everything into a Zotero library and this
is a good excuse to do so. For a single article to start things off,
I would recommend Miriam Posner's "What's Next: The Radical,
Unrealized Potential of the Digital Humanities"
<https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled/section/a22aca14-0eb0-4cc6-a622-6fee9428a357>
as an interesting read.
Best,
Erin
Erin Canning
canni...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:canni...@uoguelph.ca>
Ontology Systems Analyst, LINCS
https://lincsproject.ca/<https://lincsproject.ca/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Crm-sig <crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr> on behalf of
Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig <crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>
*Sent:* March 8, 2021 12:52 PM
*To:* crm-sig <crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>
*Subject:* Re: [Crm-sig] Issue:530 Bias in the CRM
EXTERNAL EMAIL:
Fantastic! Thank you for sharing and you are first in the list.
For the rest in list and if you did not attend today's sessions,
following discussion for issue 530, a working group is being formed
to
discuss bias in the CRM. Please let me know if you wish to contribute
to
the discussion.
All the best,
Thanasis
On 08/03/2021 17:17, Anaïs Guillem wrote:
Dear Thanasis, all,
Some digital humanists work and publish on this question of bias in
digital humanities: here is an example of very a propos publication:
https://journals.dartmouth.edu/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Journals.woa/xmlpage/4/article/425
<https://journals.dartmouth.edu/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Journals.woa/xmlpage/4/article/425>
<https://journals.dartmouth.edu/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Journals.woa/xmlpage/4/article/425
<https://journals.dartmouth.edu/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Journals.woa/xmlpage/4/article/425>>
I gathered myself bibliography about decolonizing knowledge and
methodology especially in digital project. I could join the
discussion
of your working group if you want.
Cheers,
Anais
Le mer. 3 mars 2021 à 14:58, Athanasios Velios
<thana...@softicon.co.uk
<mailto:thana...@softicon.co.uk <mailto:thana...@softicon.co.uk>>> a
écrit :
Dear all,
In version 7.1 a short but important sentence has been
added at the end
of the scope section:
"Discussions on the types of bias present in the CIDOC CRM
are in
progress within the CIDOC CRM community."
Issue 530 is used to track the discussions here:
http://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-530-bias-in-data-structure
<http://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-530-bias-in-data-structure>
<http://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-530-bias-in-data-structure
<http://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-530-bias-in-data-structure>>
It is important to engage in this discussion so that we
first understand
the issues around bias and privileged positions and then
how these may
or may not impact the development of the model.
We will then be more confident in making a more complete
statement is
future versions. Issue 530 is scheduled to be discussed at
the community
session of the forthcoming meeting.
Looking forward to it.
All the best,
Thanasis
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr <mailto:Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
<mailto:Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>>
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
<http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig>
<http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
<http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig>>
--
Anaïs Guillem
Architect-archaeologist
+33 630005089
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
<http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig>