Dear all,
In the context of the homework for this issue I report a bit of
information about way to make statements about triples.
During the last conversation on the issue, I believe we did discuss the
usefulness of formalising a way to talk about named graph. The
conversation was born, if
Dear all,
I'm pleased to report that this issue has made the official SIG issue list:
http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-526-named-graph-usage-recommendations-guideline-document
For all interested parties to this issue with knowledge and experience, a
very warm welcome is extended to attend the
Dear all,
Before the last SIG, together with CHIN, we proposed an issue on discussing
best practice in the application of named graphs by the CIDOC CRM
community. In order to empirically ground this conversation and build a
background understanding of the present state of the art, CHIN and myself
Dear all,
Just a reminder of the existence of this survey on named graphs:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeIPyE6uZ5r32G4Ejznk5E6X4rkj45fuEzj_Z9QzL2R_F07zA/viewform
Those who have knowledge and an opinion on the use of named graphs for
managing cultural heritage semantic data are
Dear all,
Given the packed agenda of the CRM SIG, we were not able to talk about
named graphs during the course of this SIG.
I would hope to move the conversation forward significantly between now and
the next SIG in parallel with the work on issue 382
Dear all,
As a complement to the work going on in issue 382 on where to document and
where not to document provenance, I suggest a parallel avenue of
research/work related to the implementation of named graphs for data sets
using CIDOC CRM. As named graphs are now commonly used in semantic data
