Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] FW: [Doug on the Eclipse CDT] New comment on Eclipse smells kind of dead???.

2013-07-12 Thread Denis Roy
Actually, I think it is awesome feedback, since there are only a handful of issues that seem to raise the anger levels. I was able to trace a few of the top items to some old bugs: File out of sync: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=228039 Line numbers on by default:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] FW: [Doug on the Eclipse CDT] New comment on Eclipse smells kind of dead???.

2013-07-12 Thread Doug Schaefer
It is. And I'm sure there are hate sites for every tool people use. Eclipse isn't unique that way. My point is that user experience is so important to our success, we need to be sensitive to the issues our users are facing. There are a lot of such issues marked WONTFIX, and CDT is as guilty of

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] FW: [Doug on the Eclipse CDT] New comment on Eclipse smells kind of dead???.

2013-07-12 Thread Ed Willink
Hi Get a committer from a related but independent project to review the Bugzilla discussion to form a less prejudiced on view on whether the WONTFIX is justified. Regards Ed Willink On 12/07/2013 17:25, Doug Schaefer wrote:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] FW: [Doug on the Eclipse CDT] New comment on Eclipse smells kind of dead???.

2013-07-12 Thread Doug Schaefer
I'm sure your powers that be will tell you we've all been trying that for years. Eclipse doesn't suck enough for that to work, which is a good thing in a way. That's why I hope we can aim at the grassroots people, individual users, who have the skills to help. Doug. From: Denis Roy

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] FW: [Doug on the Eclipse CDT] New comment on Eclipse smells kind of dead???.

2013-07-12 Thread Igor Fedorenko
How is this going to help? In most/all cases bugs are not fixed because nobody comes forward with quality fixes. Weather somebody says it needs to be fixed does not matter unless his/her words are backed up by the code. -- Regards, Igor On 2013-07-12 11:50 PM, Ed Willink wrote: Hi Get a

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] FW: [Doug on the Eclipse CDT] New comment on Eclipse smells kind of dead???.

2013-07-12 Thread Ed Merks
Igor, I think it's even stronger than that. In the end, WONTFIX shouldn't mean I don't have time or I don't feel like it but rather it's working as designed and changing it isn't what I believe is appropriate. As such, even if someone provided a fix, that's not what's desired. Committers

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] FW: [Doug on the Eclipse CDT] New comment on Eclipse smells kind of dead???.

2013-07-12 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Just to clarify on terminology I used/implied. WONTFIX is a real problem which won't be fixed for lack of interest and/or resources. INVALID when the system works as designed. -- Regards, Igor On 2013-07-13 12:57 AM, Ed Merks wrote: Igor, I think it's even stronger than that. In the end,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] FW: [Doug on the Eclipse CDT] New comment on Eclipse smells kind of dead???.

2013-07-12 Thread Jesse McConnell
that sounds like something that should be cleaned up a la CLOSED/RESOLVED reminds me of stackoverflow's recent close changes http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2013/06/the-war-of-the-closes/?cb=1 jesse -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Igor Fedorenko

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] FW: [Doug on the Eclipse CDT] New comment on Eclipse smells kind of dead???.

2013-07-12 Thread Ed Willink
Hi That's exactly what I mean by 'less prejudiced'. The project committers can always produce a long list of reasons for WONTFIX, often including time/money. The users can produce a long list of WIBNIFs. If an independent view considers the benefits are genuine and outweigh the problems,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] FW: [Doug on the Eclipse CDT] New comment on Eclipse smells kind of dead???.

2013-07-12 Thread Ed Merks
Igor, So there's even a problem with terminology! Here are two recent examples of what I consider WONTFIX: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=410587 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=411437 In both cases I don't doubt there is a problem, so I don't consider it

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] FW: [Doug on the Eclipse CDT] New comment on Eclipse smells kind of dead???.

2013-07-12 Thread Denis Roy
On 07/12/2013 02:59 PM, David M Williams wrote: Denis, you said ... (including the Bugzilla UI) is starting to suck, and I've already begun selling the idea to the powers that be. Can you say more? Are you thinking of replacing bugzilla? Or just customizing its UI? ... and possibly fields? I