We left scout-rap disabled for Mars M1 on purpose. We expect to have it
included in M2.
Regards
Adrian
Von: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] Im Auftrag von David M
Williams
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. August 2014 21:09
An:
Hi Wayne,
I create a release entry, we'll fill it with content (release plan) in
the days to come.
Tom
[1]https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.efxclipse/releases/2.0.0
On 20.08.14 16:20, Wayne Beaton wrote:
You need to create a release record in the PMI:
On 20 Aug 2014, at 10:46, Tom Schindl wrote:
Hi,
e(fx)clipse would like to join the Mars release as a +3 component
because we depend on Xtext who is +2.
Our current plan is to contribute e(fx)clipse 2.0 because this is the
first time we are joining (I need to make myself familiar with the
Hi,
EGF will be participating in the Mars simultaneous release.
Offset: +3
Release record:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emf.egf/releases/1.3.0
Regards,
Benoit
Benoit Langlois
Model-Driven Engineering Expert Product Lead
Thales/Corporate Engineering/IEE/IWB
18 Avenue
Hi all,
Just for the record: Jubula will continue to participate in the simultaneous
release.
Offset: +3
Release record:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.jubula/releases/3.1-mars
- Achim
BREDEX GmbH
Mauernstr. 33
38100 Braunschweig
Tel.: +49-531-24330-0
Fax:
I guess this raises another question. What about the other way. e(fx)clipse
doesn't get in the way, but does it help either? i.e. With e(fx)clipse on the
release train, would it be possible to have an Eclipse EPP package use JavaFX?
All the magic required to get this actually running really
Hi,
QVTo will be participating in Mars. The offset will be +2.
Release record:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.mmt.qvt-oml/releases/4.0.0
Sergey Boyko
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To
Just so everyone knows that to expect ... Markus, Christopher and I have
discussed our coordination on Friday mornings, and decided it would be
easier to target 10 AM (Eastern) to make the repository visible, and (in
many cases) the EPP packages visible at about that same time. Of course,
Perfect.
Thanks,
Wayne
On 21/08/14 03:12 AM, Tom Schindl wrote:
Hi Wayne,
I create a release entry, we'll fill it with content (release plan) in
the days to come.
Tom
[1]https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.efxclipse/releases/2.0.0
On 20.08.14 16:20, Wayne Beaton wrote:
You
Hey folks.
A lot of projects have already declared their intention to participate
in Mars. I've been updating the participation page [1] as these
declarations come in. The deadline to declare participation is M4
(December 19), but there's no reason to delay.
For those of you who have not
a) Does it Help
---
Yes it does help IMHO.
Take for example the GEF4 people they have never ever thought about how
JavaFX gets on the classpath they just use it like they use any other
thing that is part of the JDK, with the small difference that they
import javafx-packages in their
Hello,
EMF Facet will be participating in Mars. The offset will be +2.
Release record:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emft.emf-facet/releases/0.5.0
Regards,
Grégoire
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
Guys,
Isn't it a fundamental problem that the fake a.jre and a.jre.se
units in the repo are only for Java 1.6? I.e., should there be units
for 1.7 and 1.8? After all, how do javax packages new to 1.7 or 1.8 (if
there are any) become visible for package imports in bundles?
I've never
EMF Facet has been in incubation for four years. Isn't time to move out
and get a nice apartment of your own? (i.e. graduate)
(I'm practicing for a similar discussion with my son)
Wayne
On 21/08/14 12:41 PM, Grégoire Dupé wrote:
Hello,
EMF Facet will be participating in Mars. The offset
Yes, yes it issorry, I wasn't paying attention ;)
- Original Message -
I've assumed +2 based on last year.
Wayne
On 19/08/14 01:05 PM, Bob Brodt wrote:
The BPMN2 metamodel project will be participating in Mars. Release
documentation can be found here:
Hi Ed,
I was not aware of the existence of such a mechanism. Actually, the
org.eclipse.javafx bundle provided by e(fx)clipse is nothing more than such a
fake bundle, which provides exactly the javafx packages (so others can resolve
against it).
While I do not want to deny e(fx)clipse any
The BPEL Designer project will be participating in the Mars release with a +3
offset.
The release record is here:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/soa.bpel/releases/1.0.5
Thanks,
Bob
Robert (Bob) Brodt
Senior Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
The BPMN2 Modeler project will be participating in the Mars release with a +3
offset.
The release record is here:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/soa.bpmn2-modeler/releases/1.1.1
Thanks,
Bob
Robert (Bob) Brodt
Senior Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
Hi,
You guys are mixing things!
What Ed describes is only there for p2 so that it can resolve target
platforms who are NOT mapped against a JRE but can only be used when a
final EE (e.g. JavaSE-1.7 EE) exposes the package at runtime - this is
true for javax stuff which is part of the
/gitroot wasn't mounted on one of the servers after a reboot. Try now.
Denis
On 08/21/2014 03:59 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
When I try to view any Git repos [1], I get the message No repositories
found”.
Any ideas?
Greg
[1] https://git.eclipse.org/c/cdt/org.eclipse.cdt.git
Hi Tom,
I was only referring to the org.eclipse.javafx bundle of e(fx)clipse, which -
as far as I understood - is basically there to deal with the target resolving,
while the org.eclipse.fx.osgi seems to perform the runtime resolving, right? I
am no expert, but as far as the target resolving
Tom,
It is my impression that this is also an install time resolution issue,
not just a TP resolution issue. Of course there is also the runtime
resolution issue: at that time there is a real JRE that must provide
resolutions to be able to load actual classes. So yes, that's
definitely a
Working again. Thanks!
On Aug 21, 2014, at 4:09 PM, Denis Roy denis@eclipse.org wrote:
/gitroot wasn't mounted on one of the servers after a reboot. Try now.
Denis
On 08/21/2014 03:59 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
When I try to view any Git repos [1], I get the message No repositories
When I try to view any Git repos [1], I get the message No repositories
found”.
Any ideas?
Greg
[1] https://git.eclipse.org/c/cdt/org.eclipse.cdt.git
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your
On 21.08.14 22:18, Alexander Nyßen wrote:
Hi Tom,
I was only referring to the org.eclipse.javafx bundle of e(fx)clipse,
which - as far as I understood - is basically there to deal with the
target resolving, while the org.eclipse.fx.osgi seems to perform the
runtime resolving, right? I am no
You are right in that it is an install time problem as well - i think
from a p2 point of view tp-resolution install a fairly equal - i think
it is the same p2-API-call!
The problem at runtime is:
a) javafx is not part of any EE so if you have a package import of
javafx OSGi will not wire your
Tom,
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 21.08.2014 um 22:32 schrieb Tom Schindl tom.schi...@bestsolution.at:
On 21.08.14 22:18, Alexander Nyßen wrote:
Hi Tom,
I was only referring to the org.eclipse.javafx bundle of e(fx)clipse,
which - as far as I understood - is basically there to deal
27 matches
Mail list logo
