LDT (Koneki) depends on DLTK.
We never test it on DLTK 5.1. (We never found a repository to test it,
it seems available since June 11th or 12th)
There no problem for us to go with DLTK 5.0. It seems more reasonable.
Some threads to show we try to avoid that :
-
Bernard sbern...@sierrawireless.com
To: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org,
Date: 06/13/2014 05:28 AM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] DLTK in Luna RC4
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
LDT (Koneki) depends on DLTK.
We never
-project-issues-dev] DLTK in Luna RC4
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
LDT (Koneki) depends on DLTK.
We never test it on DLTK 5.1. (We never found a repository to test it,
it seems available since June
Greetings folks.
We noticed that DTLK updated their aggregation file only just this week
to point at their 5.1 bits. Too late, I'm afraid to make it into the RC4
build (which currently includes their 2013 5.0 bits) and EPP packages.
Which Luna projects consume DLTK? (PDT and who else?)
Have
Adding Koneki to the thread to make sure this gets noticed – I strongly suspect
LDT might be impacted too
Benjamin
Le 12 juin 2014 à 21:31, Wayne Beaton wa...@eclipse.org a écrit :
Greetings folks.
We noticed that DTLK updated their aggregation file only just this week to
point at their
