A service release never requires a review (nor does it require an IP Log
review). So, yes, just create a release record and you're good-to-go.
IMHO a release that only updates from the EPL-1.0 to EPL-2.0 is a service
release. I, naturally, defer to a project's PMC if they have a different
opinion.
Wayne,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the new bits being contributed are just
a service release then no review is required, only the release record,
correct?
On 09.02.2020 18:15, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Updating to the EPL-2.0 (and, by extension, the SUA 2.0) is not a
simultaneous release parti
Updating to the EPL-2.0 (and, by extension, the SUA 2.0) is not a
simultaneous release participation requirement, it's a general requirement.
I haven't been as noisy as I should have been on this forum. Instead, I've
been working with individual projects as they engage in the release
process. I'd
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 11:12 AM Ed Merks wrote:
> Wayne,
>
> Are you suggesting that SUA 2.0 is a new participation requirement? It
> seems to me merely a very-nice-to-have. At this point I would just be
> happy if there were no corrupted variants of SUA 1.0 and SUA 1.1:
>
> https://bugs.ecli
Wayne,
Are you suggesting that SUA 2.0 is a new participation requirement? It
seems to me merely a very-nice-to-have. At this point I would just be
happy if there were no corrupted variants of SUA 1.0 and SUA 1.1:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=553881
https://bugs.eclipse
Hey folks!
Today is the M2 date for the simultaneous release. I'll be assembling the
project participation information shortly.
If you are planning to contribute new bits to the 2020-03 simultaneous
release, and have not already done so, please create a release record as
soon as possible. It'll b
