> >> Hello,
> >> The Linux-kernel maintainer rejected the /dev/crypto solution and has
> >> added similar - but incompatible - functionality in the mainline kernel.
> >> Check AF_ALG. There is comparison with it in cryptodev-linux pages.
> > Thanks for your reply and great work on the benchmark co
On 03/29/2013 10:12 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
>> Hello,
>> The Linux-kernel maintainer rejected the /dev/crypto solution and has
>> added similar - but incompatible - functionality in the mainline kernel.
>> Check AF_ALG. There is comparison with it in cryptodev-linux pages.
> Thanks for your
Hi Nikos,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
>
> On 03/29/2013 06:41 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
>
>
> > My questions are:
> > (1) Why is the cryptodev-linux maintained separately outside of the kernel
> > tree? Is there a plan to push it to the mainline kernel?
>
>
On 03/29/2013 06:41 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
> My questions are:
> (1) Why is the cryptodev-linux maintained separately outside of the kernel
> tree? Is there a plan to push it to the mainline kernel?
Hello,
The Linux-kernel maintainer rejected the /dev/crypto solution and has
added similar
Hello,
I am evaluating using cryptodev-linux instead of ocf-linux as it appears to
make more recent releases .
My questions are:
(1) Why is the cryptodev-linux maintained separately outside of the kernel
tree? Is there a plan to push it to the mainline kernel?
(2) What features will we be missin
Hello,
I am evaluating using cryptodev-linux instead of ocf-linux as it appears to
make more recent releases .
My questions are:
(1) Why is the cryptodev-linux maintained separately outside of the kernel
tree? Is there a plan to push it to the mainline kernel?
(2) What features will we be missin
