Phil Karn wrote:
I believe the anti-Tempest provisions have been in the export regs
for some time.
Yes, but when did they appear? We're attempting to trace
Tempest's origin -- not easy because of classification of
so much stuff. One classified standard dates to 1967. A
French article on Tempest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sat 01/15/00 at 06:06 PM -0800):
arguments can be made for why you don't need to get that many texts
even given no knowledge of the watermark system. I'll post more if
pushed --PM]
Please do, this sounds interesting.
ditto.
[Joe Sixpack has nothing to to lose
Digital watermarks again!
Joe Sixpack won't believe his file contains a digital watermark with
his name in it unless there is a freely distributed Windows/Mac
program which reads the watermark and so spits out his name and other
personal details.
That being the case, it is only a matter of
What use is the watermark anyway? It is only applicable to files
generated for a specific, legally identifiable customer. Therefore it
does not apply to pre-pressed CD/DVD etc. discs or to broadcasts via
the Net, TV, radio etc.
Well, serial numbers are somewhat useful in tracking pirate
