FBI wiretap worries slow satellite phones

1999-08-04 Thread Eric Blossom
Good article. http://www.news.com/News/Item/0%2c4%2c40048%2c00.html?dd.ne.txt.0803.03 FBI wiretap worries slow satellite phones By John Borland Staff Writer, CNET News.com August 3, 1999, 4:00 a.m. PT The Federal Bureau of Investigation is putting the brakes--at least temporarily--on the

Product Evaluations (was: Re: House committee ditches...)

1999-08-04 Thread Rick Smith
At 02:19 AM 8/3/99, Peter Gutmann wrote: [1] There isn't any rule of thumb for the work involved in attaining the higher assurance levels because it's done so rarely, although in terms of cost and time I've seen an estimate of $40M for an A1 Multics (it never eventuated) and DEC's A1

Re: linux-ipsec: Re: Summary re: /dev/random

1999-08-04 Thread Henry Spencer
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, bram wrote: The goal is to make it so that any time someone wants random numbers they can go to /dev/random, with no required studying of entropy and threat models and all that yadda yadda yadda which most developers will rightfully recoil from getting into when all they

Re: Summary re: /dev/random

1999-08-04 Thread bram
On Mon, 2 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Linux's /dev/random uses a very different design, in that it uses a large pool to store the entropy. As long as you have enough entropy (i.e., you don't overdraw on the pool's entropy), /dev/random isn't relying on the cryptographic properties as

Re: Subject: Re: Security Lab To Certify Banking Applications (was Re: ECARM NEWS for July 23,1999 Second Ed.)

1999-08-04 Thread Marty Levy
Keeping an ITSEC TOE confidential is not unusual. It would be more unusual to not keep it confidential or at least restricted distribution, given the contents. It is a major flaw of the scheme...you are trusting the certifier to enforce a "good" TOE if they are going to give an E3-High rating.

Re: linux-ipsec: Re: Summary re: /dev/random

1999-08-04 Thread Paul Koning
"Osma" == Osma Ahvenlampi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Osma Looking at this discussing going round and round, I'm very Osma inclined to fetch the latest freeswan-snapshot, grep for Osma /dev/random, and replace all reads with a routine that has it's Osma own internal Yarrow-like SHA mixer that

Re: linux-ipsec: /dev/random

1999-08-04 Thread Bill Frantz
At 12:35 PM -0700 8/2/99, John Denker wrote: 2) Network timing may be subject to observation and possibly manipulation by the attacker. My real-time clocks are pretty coarse (10ms resolution). This subthread started with a discussion of software to estimate the entropy of a bitstream, and I

Re: linux-ipsec: /dev/random

1999-08-04 Thread John Denker
At 10:08 AM 8/4/99 -0400, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: I think that this description reflects an inappropriate understanding of entropy. Entropy is in some sense spread throughout the whole output of /dev/urandom. You don't use entropy up, you spread it over more and more bytes of output. This

IP: Security of on-line banking studied

1999-08-04 Thread Robert Hettinga
--- begin forwarded text From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 11:10:49 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IP: Security of on-line banking studied Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: $[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: Washington Times

more than linear algebra?

1999-08-04 Thread staym
I have a set of unit vectors, but don't know their coordinates, or even the dimension of the space they span. I'm given the angle between each pair of vectors in units of some unknown "unit angle". I'd like to find the smallest dimension into which the set fits, as well as the range of values

Re: Proposed bill for tax credit to develop encryption with covert access

1999-08-04 Thread David Jablon
At 05:44 PM 8/2/99 -0400, Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking wrote: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d106:h.r.02617: I'm sure you'll all be enthusiastic about the chance to save your company tax money. Amazing! Despite the title, this seems to be a retro-active tax break for

Re: Proposed bill for tax credit to develop encryption with covert access

1999-08-04 Thread Russell Nelson
-- BEGIN 2rot-13 David Jablon writes: Amazing! Despite the title, this seems to be a retro-active tax break for all developers of snake-oil and other poorly concieved or poorly implemented cryptography. Or for that matter, poorly selling. There's nothing in the bill that requires that