Peter Gutmann wrote:
Ian Farquhar (ifarquha) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For example: the Gigabyte GA-965QM-DS2 (rev 2.0) which features security
enhancement by TPM. More common (ASUS, Foxconn) was the TPM Connector,
which seemed to be a hedged bet, by replacing the cost of the TPM chip with
David G. Koontz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are third party TPM modules, which could allow some degree of
standardization:
As I said in my previous message, just because they exist doesn't mean they'll
do anything if you plug them into a MB with the necessary header (assuming you
have a MB
| ...Apple is one vendor who I gather does include a TPM chip on their
| systems, I gather, but that wasn't useful for me.
Apple included TPM chips on their first round of Intel-based Macs.
Back in 2005, there were all sorts of stories floating around the net
about how Apple would use TPM to
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemviewitem=item=180133437659#6376261103687981571
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe
of possible interest...
Original Message
Subject: [saag] SHA-2 patent status
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:55:46 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of possible interest (but hopefully no concern) to this list: a new
IPR statement from the NSA to the
Forwarded:
From: Radu Sion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CFP: Financial Cryptography and Data Security 2008 [deadline:
September 25]
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:07:37 -0400
Reply-To: Radu Sion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Colleague,
This is an advanced call for papers for the Financial
Cryptography
David G. Koontz writes:
There are third party TPM modules, which could allow some degree of
standardization:
http://www.ieiworld.com/en/news_content.asp?id=erbium/projectOBJ00244201news_cate=Newsnews_sub_cate=Product
The IEI TPM module is used in their own motherboards and some VIA
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:59:55 +1000
James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many protocols use some form of self describing data format, for
example ASN.1, XML, S expressions, and bencoding.
Why?
Presumably both ends of the conversation have negotiated what
protocol version they are
It seems odd for the TPM of all devices to be put on a pluggable module as
shown here. The whole point of the chip is to be bound tightly to the
motherboard and to observe the boot and initial program load sequence.
Maybe I am showing my eternal optimist side here, but to me, this is how
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 04:42:56PM +1200, David G. Koontz wrote:
Apple (mis)uses
TPM to unsuccessfully prevent OS X from running on non-Apple Hardware.
All Apple on Intel machines have TPM, that's what 6 percent of new PCs?
To nit pick, the TPM is only present in some Apple Intel
machines
10 matches
Mail list logo
