On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:28:50 -0800
Stephan Somogyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 16:38 +1300 04.01.2008, Peter Gutmann wrote:
>
> >At $1.40 each (at least in sub-1K quantities) you wonder whether
> >it's costing them more to add the DRM (spread over all battery
> >sales) than any marginal gain i
Forwarded with permission.
This is part of a discussion of the proposed SHA-3 API for the NIST
competition. Those interested in discussing it should subscribe to the
list; see http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/hash/email_list.html for
instructions.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10
On Jan 3, 2008, at 10:47 PM, Peter Gutmann wrote:
That's because there's nothing much to publish:
In the US, notify the BIS via email.
Our outside counsel -- specializing in this area -- thought this was
insufficient. That said, thanks for all the feedback in the thread --
I'll pass the inf
At 16:38 +1300 04.01.2008, Peter Gutmann wrote:
At $1.40 each (at least in sub-1K quantities) you wonder whether it's costing
them more to add the DRM (spread over all battery sales) than any marginal
gain in preventing use of third-party batteries by a small subset of users.
I don't think I a
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:38:07PM +1300, Peter Gutmann wrote:
>At $1.40 each (at least in sub-1K quantities) you wonder whether it's costing
>them more to add the DRM (spread over all battery sales) than any marginal
>gain in preventing use of third-party batteries by a small subset of users.
The
* Marcos el Ruptor:
>> http://www.intersil.com/cda/deviceinfo/0,1477,ISL6296,0.html
>
>
> "A 32-Bit CRC-based hash engine (FlexiHashTM)
> calculates the authentication result immediately after
> receiving a 32-Bit random challenge code."
>
> huh?
> heh!
If the law is on your side, you don't need
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Alex Alten wrote:
> I think that we will have to move toward encrypting more data at
> rest in some manner that is that is easy for the user to use (like
> ATM cash cards) yet difficult for a malicious piece of software on
> the user's machine to circumvent. This will require t
On Jan 3, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Peter Gutmann wrote:
http://www.intersil.com/cda/deviceinfo/0,1477,ISL6296,0.html
At $1.40 each (at least in sub-1K quantities) you wonder whether
it's costing
them more to add the DRM (spread over all battery sales) than any
marginal
gain in preventing use of t
| > | ...Also, I hate to say this, we may need to also require that all
| > | encrypted traffic allow inspection of their contents under proper
| > | authority (CALEA essentially)
| > Why not just require that the senders of malign packets set the Evil Bit
| > in their IP headers?
| >
| > How
At 05:47 PM 1/4/2008 -0500, Leichter, Jerry wrote:
| ...Also, I hate to say this, we may need to also require that all
| encrypted traffic allow inspection of their contents under proper
| authority (CALEA essentially)
Why not just require that the senders of malign packets set the Evil Bit
i
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Leichter, Jerry wrote:
Over all, I find it hard to see how such a product can really make
sense, however. If there's enough money to make it worth trying to keep
the clone makers out, there's enough money in it for the clone makers to
be willing to invest in determining the
| ...Also, I hate to say this, we may need to also require that all
| encrypted traffic allow inspection of their contents under proper
| authority (CALEA essentially)
Why not just require that the senders of malign packets set the Evil Bit
in their IP headers?
How can you possibly require tha
12 matches
Mail list logo
