On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Isn't this just a clarification of existing CALEA practice?
>
> In most jurisdictions, if a communications services provider is served
> an order to make available communications, it is required by law to
> provide it in the clear. Anything
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Dustin D. Trammell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the same for the state-wide Texas tag, TxTag[1]. If your tag
> doesn't register, or you disable or remove it, the toll system can still
> accurately bill you based on your license plate and vehicle
> registra
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Perry E. Metzger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Despite previous reassurances about the security of the system,
> Nate Lawson of Root Labs claims that the unique identity numbers
> used to identify the FasTrak wireless transponders carried in cars
> can be cop
A lot of people seem to agree with what Declan McCullagh writes here:
> It's going to make us rethink how we handle laptops in sleep mode and servers
> that use
> encrypted filesystems (a mail server, for instance).
What I'd like to know is why people weren't already rethinking this
when people
On 7/9/07, alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Makes me wonder how this will effect the OpenMoko phone if someone builds
an encryption layer for it. (OpenMoko is a totally open sourced phone.)
Leigh Honeywell and Paul Wouters presented a 'crypto-phone' effort
they have been working on at CCC in Ge
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> The bigger issue, though, is more subtle: keeping track of the keys
> is non-trivial. These need to be backed up, too, and kept separate
> from (but synchronized with) the tapes. Worse yet, they need to be
> kept secure. That may mean storing the keys with a different
