Hal Finney wrote:
My question to the assembled: are cryptographic keys really subject to
DMCA subject to takedown requests? I suspect they are not
copyrightable under the criterion from the phone directory
precedent.
A sample demand letter from the AACS Licensing Authority appears at:
On 01 May 2007 22:33, Jon Callas wrote:
On May 1, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
unsigned char* guess_key(void)
{
unsigned
char key[] = {0x0a, 0xFa, 0x12, 0x03,
0xD9, 0x42, 0x57, 0xC6,
0x9E, 0x75, 0xE4, 0x5C,
My question to the assembled: are cryptographic keys really subject to
DMCA subject to takedown requests? I suspect they are not
copyrightable under the criterion from the phone directory
precedent.
A sample demand letter from the AACS Licensing Authority appears at:
A lot of sites have been getting DMCA takedowns for the HD-DVD
processing key that got leaked recently.
My question to the assembled: are cryptographic keys really subject to
DMCA subject to takedown requests? I suspect they are not
copyrightable under the criterion from the phone directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal Finney) writes:
A sample demand letter from the AACS Licensing Authority appears at:
http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=03218
From what I can see, there is no claim that the key is copyrighted.
Rather, the letter refers to the provisions of the DMCA which
At 05:04 PM 5/1/2007 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal Finney) writes:
A sample demand letter from the AACS Licensing Authority appears at:
http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=03218
...
This seems odd to me because my understanding of the DMCA's
On May 1, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
A lot of sites have been getting DMCA takedowns for the HD-DVD
processing key that got leaked recently.
My question to the assembled: are cryptographic keys really subject to
DMCA subject to takedown requests? I suspect they are not