On Jul 29, 2010, at 22:23, Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
On 07/28/2010 10:34 PM, d...@geer.org wrote:
The design goal for any security system is that the number of
failures is small but non-zero, i.e., N0. If the number of
failures is zero, there is no way to disambiguate good luck
from
On 07/28/2010 10:34 PM, d...@geer.org wrote:
The design goal for any security system is that the number of
failures is small but non-zero, i.e., N0. If the number of
failures is zero, there is no way to disambiguate good luck
from spending too much. Calibration requires differing outcomes.
for the fun of it ... from today ...
Twenty-Four More Reasons Not To Trust Your Browser's Padlock
http://blogs.forbes.com/firewall/2010/07/29/twenty-four-more-reasons-not-to-trust-your-browsers-padlock/?boxes=Homepagechannels
from above:
On stage at the Black Hat security conference Wednesday,
