--- begin forwarded text
Status: U
To: DemocratsConvHall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: CodeTen7 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailing-List: list [EMAIL PROTECTED]; contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 23:25:26 -0600
Subject: [johnmacsgroup] INTEL: Venona Project
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Venona
Le ven 27/06/2003 à 15:24, Werner Koch a écrit :
Does the proprietary SSH still use GMP? I know no other major crypto
apps using GMP for big number math. A problem with GMP is that it
heavily uses alloca() and thus it is not that hard to find traces of
secrets in the core.
I know that
--- begin forwarded text
Status: U
Thread-Topic: [CYBERIA] Combining Verizon DMCA case with Grokster
Thread-Index:
AcMU4iXZDMSa+RRWQF2ZUhfFWfqnygAAvxfwAlB7E0AAkYhJYAEs5nrAAGjbCxAAB3Zw8ADDJcDQADTT+2AALZj34AAK9CcQAMC7Y7ADgxgEkA==
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:02:33 -0400
Reply-To: Law
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Peter Fairbrother [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.06.27.1903 +0200]:
Can you give me a ref to where they say that? I'd like to know
exactly what they are claiming.
this will have to wait a couple of days.
Perhaps they are encrypting the DH secrets with RSA keys
(I've also posted this message to sci.crypt)
Hi list,
NTRU Cryptosystems has posted several new documents, which are
avaible through http://www.ntru.com/cryptolab/params.htm.
As background: recent results on NTRUEncrypt have shown that
decryption failures on validly encrypted messages leak
martin f krafft writes:
My point was that some commercial vendors (Check Point and others)
claim, that if two partners want to perform a DH key exchange, they
may use their two public keys for g and p. This, in effect, would
mean that g and p were not globally known, but that the public keys
Close to 100 people have downloaded the book so far [which is alot
given the nature of the book] and although it has only been two days I
was wondering if anyone has any initial impressions [good or bad].
I'm going to start the editing phase of the text fairly soon so I'd
like to know what people
