Ben Laurie wrote:
[snip]
And so we end up at the position that we have ended up at so many times
before: the GTCYM has to have a decent processor, a keyboard and a
screen, and must be portable and secure.
One day we'll stop concluding this and actually do something about it.
And it can a
A paper enigma machine:
http://mckoss.com/Crypto/Enigma.htm
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Howe wrote:
James A. Donald wrote:
From time to time I hear that DNSSEC is working fine, and on
examining the matter I find it is "working fine" except that
DNSSEC is "working fine" as a technology. However, it is worth
remembering that it works based on digitally signing an entire
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:52:07 +1000
"James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From time to time I hear that DNSSEC is working fine, and on
> examining the matter I find it is "working fine" except that
>
> Seems to me that if DNSSEC is actually working fine, I should be able
> to provid
