Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
what i said was that it was specifying a simplified SSL/TLS based on the
business requirements for the primary use of SSL/TLS as opposed to a
simplified SSL/TLS based on the existing technical specifications and
existing implementations.
I totally agree that
Okay, okay. I've got the message. I give in.
The toolkit will be distributed with the most generous, most liberal
license possible. This means that (basically) anyone can do pretty much
anything with it, including release binaries compiled with it.
I'm happy with this decision. It means that
I wrote:
Peter (I define myself to be A BIT CYNICAL about all this).
Since it could appear that I'm gratuitously bashing FIPS 140 (or certification
processes in general) here, I should clarify: As with all attempts at one-
size-fits-all solutions, one size doesn't quite fit all. You can break
--- begin forwarded text
Status: U
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 23:51:03 -0400 (EDT)
To: R.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Simson L. Garfinkel, RFID Privacy Workshop Chair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFID Privacy Workshop @ MIT - November 15th
Dear Workshop Registrant,
Thank you for registering for the
Too late. I've already started. Besides which, posts on this group
suggest that there is a demand for such a toolkit.
Also, I have a lot of interest in SSL/TLS, and no interest whatsoever in
IPsec. I believe I am a competent programmer, but the fact is, if you
want me to write something in my
Anton Stiglic wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ian Grigg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
In terms of actual practical systems, ones
that implement to Brands' level don't exist,
as far as I know?
There were however several projects that implemented
and tested the credentials
--- begin forwarded text
Status: U
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:10:52 -0400
To: Philodox Clips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mobs Turn Net into Money Machine
Reply-To: Philodox Clips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
--- begin forwarded text
Status: U
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:09:10 +0100
Subject: Digital ID Forum News
From: Dave Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bob Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob,
Can you repost in the usual relevant place -- many thanks...
Steve Schear wrote:
[I wonder what if any effect this might have on crypto patents, e.g.,
Chaumian blinding?]
My guess is, nix, nada. Patents are a red herring
in the blinding skirmishes, they became a convenient
excuse and a point to place the flag when rallying
the troops. The battle was
