In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jonathan Thor
nburg writes:
I would never use online banking, and I advise all my friends and
colleagues (particularly those who _aren't_ computer-security-geeks)
to avoid it.
I do use it -- but never from a Windows machine. The OS I use is
probably better, but
* Nicholas Bohm:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know, I'd wonder how many people on this
list use or have used online banking.
To start the ball rolling, I have not and won't.
--dan
I do.
My bank provides an RSA SecureId, so I feel reasonably safe against
anyone other than the bank.
please, can people tell us about what their country's liability
framework is, as they understand it, and where the onus of proof is
for what sorts of transactions?
this is one of the few areas where consumers have some actual
protection in the us.
due to ross anderson, i have heard about the uk.
You know, I'd wonder how many people on this
list use or have used online banking.
To start the ball rolling, I have not and won't.
Why? Repudiating transactions is easier than ever. As a consumer, I
fear technology which is completely secure according to experts, but
which can be broken
* Eugen Leitl:
The German PIN/TAN system is reasonably secure, being an effective
one-time pad distributed through out of band channel (mailed dead
tree in a tamperproof envelope).
Some banks have optimized away the special envelope. 8-(
It is of course not immune to phishing (PIN/TAN
Joseph Ashwood wrote:
Apparently, they are, I'm ran a sample, but even with the added second
sanity check, every one of them that passes a single round comes up prime.
I then proceeded to move it to 2048-bit numbers. It takes longer and the
gaps between primes is averaging around 700 right
* Jonathan Thornburg:
Ahh, but how do you know that the transaction actually sent to the
bank is the same as the one you thought you authorized with that OTP?
If your computer (or web browser) has been cracked, you can't trust
_anything_ it displays. There are already viruses in the wild
--- begin forwarded text
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:38:43 -0500
To: Philodox Clips List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Clips] RSA buys Cyota for $145 million
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Anton Stiglic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Fermat's primality test vs. Miller-Rabin
Ok after making that change, and a few others. Selecting only odd numbers
(which acts as a small seive) I'm not getting much useful information. It
appears to be such
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
okay, i read this story from 7/2005 reporting an incident in 5/2005. the short
form of it is:
Not a bad summary. I'd say that when one is
dealing with any such crime, there are always
unanswered questions, and issues of confusion
(probably as much for the attacker
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Nicholas Bohm:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know, I'd wonder how many people on this
list use or have used online banking.
To start the ball rolling, I have not and won't.
--dan
I do.
My bank provides an RSA SecureId, so I feel reasonably safe against
anyone
11 matches
Mail list logo
