single-photon
detector? is available at
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0809/0809.3408.pdf.
-Michael Heyman
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but man that was..Tory still gets a
little white when he
describes that phone conversation.
-Michael
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/21301/?a=f
From the article: other toll systems, like E-Z Pass and I-Pass, need
to be looked at too
A couple years ago I got a letter from E-Z Pass a few days after I
used my
Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:57 AM, John Ioannidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This just about sums it up: http://xkcd.com/463/
Only slightly better then suggested by the comic. McAfee anti-virus
software was on the servers, not the DRE voting machines themselves.
From
http
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Ed Gerck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the essay Better Than Free, Kevin Kelly debates which concepts hold
value online, and how to monetize those values. See
www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/01/better_than_fre.php
Kelly's point can be very useful: *When
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Ed Gerck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We see that the trust relationship represented by that SSL cert can be
copied without any loss, as many times as you wish
My understanding is that an SSL certificate is only a method to carry
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Leichter, Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know anything about a company called 2factor (2factor.com)?
They're pushing a system based on symmetric cryptography with, it
appears, some kind of trusted authority. Factor of 100 faster
than SSL. More secure
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Leichter, Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know anything about a company called 2factor (2factor.com)?
They're pushing a system based on symmetric cryptography with, it
appears, some kind of trusted authority. Factor of 100 faster
than SSL. More secure
On Jan 27, 2008 11:18 AM, zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[adding Cc: p2p-hackers and cryptography mailing lists as explained
below; Please trim your follow-ups as appropriate.]
On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:44 PM, Gary Sumner wrote:
Surely there must be prior art on this technique to refute
unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 15, 2007 2:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to this BBC story until fairly recently the British
military refused to have PALs on nuclear weapons.
[SNIP]
From the story:
The Bomb is actually armed by inserting a bicycle lock
key into the arming switch and turning
the matter or walked away from the polls without casting a ballot
My house number starts with 3 :-)
-Michael Heyman
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/3/07, Saqib Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
or both private keys but that never seems to get mentioned
I take it back, there is only one private key but math makes multiple
temporary public keys out of it.
-Michael
On 6/25/07, Greg Troxel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Do you believe the physics? (Most people who know physics seem to.)
For those who would like to know a little more about the physics, see:
http://www.icfo.es/images/publications/J05-055.pdf, Quantum Cloning,
Valerio Scarani, Sofyan
http://enigmaco.de has a Flash-based example of the Enigma
processing with a short history and tutorial.
-Michael Heyman
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/11/07, Joseph Ashwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
112 bits of entropy is 112 bits of entropy...anything else and you're
into the world of trying to prove equivalence between entropy and
work which work in physics but doesn't work in computation
because next year the work level
On 10/19/05, R.A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EDIT]
Daugman presents
(http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/jgd1000/combine/combine.html) the two rival
intuitions, then does the maths. On the one hand, a combination of
different tests should improve performance, because more information
19 matches
Mail list logo
