Perry E. Metzger pe...@piermont.com writes:
I can think of no circumstances where I would voluntarily use LDAP as the
solution to any problem of any sort.
Our direct competitor has asked us to recommend a technology for whatever it
is that LDAP is meant to be the solution for. What should we
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 01:18:59 +1000 (EST) Dave Horsfall
d...@horsfall.org wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Anyway, I've already started implementing my proposed solution to
that part of the problem. There is still a need for a distributed
database to handle the lookup
Please stop using that stupid Reply All function; I'm on the list, and
will hence see your reply anyway.
I don't need my own bloody personal copy of it.
-- Dave
___
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:52:23 -0400 Jerry Leichter leich...@lrw.com
wrote:
But none of that matters much any more. Publication is usually
on-line, so contact addresses can be arbitrary links. When we meet
in person, we can exchange large numbers of bits between our
smartphones. Hell, even a
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:24:43 -0400 Jerry Leichter leich...@lrw.com
wrote:
I wouldn't know how to trust publication online in the first
place.
In exactly the same way you trust paper publications that contain
today's style of addresses.
But I don't. As I said, I typically get a friend or
There is still a need for a distributed
database to handle the lookup load, though, and one that is not the
DNS.
What do you think of namecoin?
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •ReflectionCybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Truth comes as conqueror only to those who have lost the art of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is exactly the problem that Kim Cameron and I tried to solve by developing
what we called call signs. The idea is to compress the hash of the public by
solving a puzzle: find the arbitrary salt so that the hash of the salt and
the public key
A different take on the problem: Would something built around identify-based
encryption help here? It sounds very tempting: My email address (or any other
string - say a bitmap of a picture of me) *is* my public key. The problem is
that it requires a central server that implicitly has
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Anyway, I've already started implementing my proposed solution to that
part of the problem. There is still a need for a distributed database to
handle the lookup load, though, and one that is not the DNS.
(Delurking)
This suggests the use of
On Aug 28, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Dave Horsfall d...@horsfall.org wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Anyway, I've already started implementing my proposed solution to that
part of the problem. There is still a need for a distributed database to
handle the lookup load,
10 matches
Mail list logo
