At 02:45 PM 11/27/2003 +1100, Greg Rose wrote:
At 12:27 PM 11/27/2003, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
RC4 is extremely weak for some applications.
A block cipher is greatly preferable.
I'm afraid that I can't agree with this howling logical error.
RC4 is showing its age, but there are other stream ciph
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 02:45:47PM +1100, Greg Rose wrote:
> At 12:27 PM 11/27/2003, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> >RC4 is extremely weak for some applications. A block cipher is greatly
> >preferable.
>
> I'm afraid that I can't agree with this howling logical error. RC4 is
> showing its age, bu
At 12:27 PM 11/27/2003, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
RC4 is extremely weak for some applications. A block cipher is greatly
preferable.
I'm afraid that I can't agree with this howling logical error. RC4 is
showing its age, but there are other stream ciphers that are acceptable,
and there are block
As a separate issue from whether you want to implement AES, if you do
decide to implement it look at Brian Gladman's code at
http://fp.gladman.plus.com/cryptography_technology/rijndael/
It is the fastest free implementation of AES that I know of, and has a
good history and credentials behind it
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:56:40PM -0800, J Harper wrote:
> Great feedback, let me elaborate. I realize that AES is implemented in
> hardware for many platforms as well. I'll mention a bit more about our
> cryptography architecture below. Do you know why AES is so popular in
> embedded? ARC4 is
-
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "J Harper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: Open Source Embedded SSL - Export Questions
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTE
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "J Harper" writes:
>SSLv3 protocol implementation
>Simple ASN.1 parsing
>Cipher suites:
>TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5
>TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA
>TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA
I understand the need to conserve space; that said, I strongly urge you
to consid
> We've implemented a small version of SSL that we plan to release as
> open source by year's end.
Great!
> We're not looking for official legal advice, just some pointers to
> current online resources of how to go about registering our product in
> the US.
http://www.bxa.doc.gov/Encryption; Goo
idney Markowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "J Harper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Open Source Embedded SSL - Export Questions
> J Harper wrote:
> > pointers to documentation on the ste
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 21:06, J Harper wrote:
...snip...
> We're not looking for official legal advice, just some pointers to
> current online resources of how to go about registering our product
> in the US. I've seen posts that for SSL implementations you "just
> need to send a letter to the go
J Harper wrote:
pointers to documentation on the steps required for government registration
The official site for this is at
http://www.bxa.doc.gov/Encryption/Default.htm
-- sidney
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by
Hi All,
We've implemented a small version of SSL that we plan to release as open source by
year's end. I've seen some discussion on this group indicating that this would be
useful in the embedded environments, given the current landscape of larger
implementations such as OpenSSL (Crypto++, etc
12 matches
Mail list logo
