John Kelsey writes:
> In the overwhelming majority of cases, I know and want to know the
> people I'm talking with. I just don't want to contents of those
> conversations or the names of people I'm talking with to be revealed
> to eavesdroppers. And if I get an email from one of my regular
> co
On Sep 15, 2013, at 7:47 AM, Adam Back wrote:
> Another design permutation I was thinking could be rather interesting is
> unobservable mail. That is to say the participants know who they are
> talking to (signed, non-pseudonymous) but passive observers do not. It
> seems to me that in that cir
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 04:55:05PM -0400, John Kelsey wrote:
The more I think about it, the more important it seems that any anonymous
email like communications system *not* include people who don't want to be
part of it, and have lots of defenses to prevent its anonymous
communications from beco
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:55:05 -0400 John Kelsey
> wrote:
> > Everyone,
> >
> > The more I think about it, the more important it seems that any
> > anonymous email like communications system *not* include people who
> > don't want to be pa
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:55:05 -0400 John Kelsey
wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> The more I think about it, the more important it seems that any
> anonymous email like communications system *not* include people who
> don't want to be part of it, and have lots of defenses to prevent
> its anonymous communica
Everyone,
The more I think about it, the more important it seems that any anonymous email
like communications system *not* include people who don't want to be part of
it, and have lots of defenses to prevent its anonymous communications from
becoming a nightmare for its participants. If the go
