aracteristics of that particular receiver. In another example, a hospital
could share the outcomes of treatment with researchers without revealing
details such as identifying patient information.
"Through functional encryption, you only get the specific answer, you don't
learn anything e
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Russell Leidich wrote:
> Thanks, Noon. It's good to know that some searches are still "hard" in the
> sense of square root as opposed to log of classical.
>
> So based on his actual claims in the papers you cited, when the EE Times
> article says:
>
> "And he clai
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Russell Leidich wrote:
> Is this to be taken seriously...
>
> Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Seth Lloyd claims to have
> developed a quantum search algo which can search 2^N (presumably unsorted)
> records in O(N) time. (This is the subtext of thi
.
A good point, of course. So what should everyone do?
> Peter.
--
Noon Silk
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
er.org
> http://arbornet.org (ravage)
>
> Adapt, Adopt, Improvise
> -- -- -- --
> ___
> cryptography mailing list
> cryptography@randombit.net
> http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
>
--
Noon Silk
Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/s
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>
> On 2013-06-13 10:49:25 +1000 (+1000), Noon Silk wrote:
> > so what's the go-to keyserver to look people up these days?
> [...]
>
> I use hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net quite happily. I generally
> point
so what's the go-to keyserver to look people up these days?
i've tried http://keyserver.rayservers.com/, it times out upon searching,
so does http://pgp.mit.edu/
am i missing some obvious places?
--
Noon Silk
___
cryptography ma
his is the last warning you're going to get."
Direct link to the paper:
http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/70/47/90/PDF/RR-7944.pdf - Efficient
Padding Oracle Attacks on Cryptographic Hardware by Bardou, Focardi,
Kawamoto, Simionato, Steel and Tsay
--
Noon Silk
Fancy a quantum lunch? http
cally
about the definition of snake oil. I just do think it's
appropriate that legitimate
research is bundled into the same attacks that are lobbied against perhaps
somewhat less legitimate products and marketing promises.
> I hope this helps
mentally valid field. QKD also seems this way. Can you explain
why you don't think QKD is valid, at a fundamental level? Some fact
that will hold forever? It doesn't seem obvious to me that there is
such a fundamental issue (of course, the very paper that sparked this
discussion presents a
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:31 AM, ianG wrote:
> On 29/01/12 10:45 AM, Noon Silk wrote:
>> ... it's not sensible to say "QKD is snake
>>
>> oil", without direct reference to something.
>
>
> Well, if you don't like the conclusion, there are books
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Noon Silk wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
>>> Until we see scalable quantum authenticated quantum secrecy / key
>>> distribution, QKD is
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2012, at 8:22 PM, Noon Silk wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Steven Bellovin
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Or at least that's what everyone thought. More recently, various
cant disagreement.]
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Noon Silk wrote:
>> I think it's important to note that it's obviously completely wrong to
>> say "QKD is snake-oil", what you *can* say is that someone *selling*
>> *any* demonstratably-insecure crypt
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2012, at 6:43 PM, Noon Silk wrote:
>
>> I think it's important to note that it's obviously completely wrong to
>> say "QKD is snake-oil",
>
> Some of us would disagree with that statement
yes, but that's a lesser concern), or the military using
> QKD is an enemy of the cause of liberty (in which case never mind and
> keep at it boys!).
>
> Nico
> --
--
Noon Silk
Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/site/quantumlunch/
"Every morning when I wake up
too easy to claim something as obvious when
someone just told you.
> --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
--
Noon Silk
Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/site/quantumlunch/
"Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy
of being this
bed to the
ECCC-Newsletter. To unsubscribe visit
http://eccc.hpi-web.de/newsletter/9bbe4a2c267ee4a1b4290639726cfc04.
--
Noon Silk
Fancy a quantum lunch? http://groups.google.com/group/quantum-lunch?hl=en
"Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite jo
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:30 PM,
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:36:55PM +1100, Noon Silk wrote:
>> Hah. I'm not sure how to take that; if you knew people wouldn't get
>> the idea from your original message why wouldn't you clarify it up
>> front?
>
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:31 PM,
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:49:26PM +1100, Noon Silk wrote:
>> Sounds to me like the simplist solution is just a one-time pad[1]. It
>> won't increase the size, and from the sounds of your environment, you
>> can just keep the
I'm misunderstanding your question.
[...]
> --
> Effing the ineffable since 1997. | http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/
> My emails do not usually have attachments; it's a digital signature
> that your mail program doesn't understand.
> If you are a spammer, p
21 matches
Mail list logo
