- Forwarded message from Seth David Schoen sch...@eff.org -
From: Seth David Schoen sch...@eff.org
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 17:06:27 -0700
To: liberationtech liberationt...@lists.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] CryptoParty Handbook
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To:
- Forwarded message from Asher Wolf asherw...@cryptoparty.org -
From: Asher Wolf asherw...@cryptoparty.org
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:26:09 +1000
To: liberationt...@lists.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] CryptoParty Handbook
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 10:58:40AM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
1. Measure. Don't speculate.
I found a benchmark here:
https://github.com/cjdelisle/cjdns/blob/master/rfcs/benchmark.txt
So it seems that is not as slow as I suspected: it can forward packets at a
rate of 7 Gbit/s on an
On 05.10.2012 10:58, Guus Sliepen wrote:
I found a benchmark here:
https://github.com/cjdelisle/cjdns/blob/master/rfcs/benchmark.txt
So it seems that is not as slow as I suspected: it can forward packets at a
rate of 7 Gbit/s on an Opteron 6128.
I think you have misread. The benchmark
It had no certificate.
Why is that?
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
On 2012-10-06 12:12 PM, Randall Webmail wrote:
It had no certificate.
Why is that?
Central authority is a security hole.
Suppose the state wants a more cooperative Tor. The guy who is most
cooperative will get to be designated the real Tor.
Instead, you should verify the digital
