On 12/21/2013 10:04 PM, Eduardo Robles Elvira wrote:
The obvious problem with this is that namecoin doesn't have all the
domain names already registered assigned to the current owners, and
there's no arbitration authority that can prevent domain cibersquatting.
This is not a weakness of
That sounds a lot like my Web of Trust based DNS suggestion. Link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Meshnet/comments/o3wex/wotdns_web_of_trust_based_domain_name_system
Domain names would not be globally unique, where they go would instead be
based on each individual node's trust ranking for the site's
On 12/22/2013 12:58 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
On 2013-12-22 19:44, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
The solution to this is that names should not claimed, they should be
given by the community that values the association. Neither DNS nor
namecoin allows for that, so both are inadequate. As an
Now there is an interesting idea. And we can refer to them as top level
domains. Perhaps since people tend to gayer geographically we can make them
geographically related. Say ca for Canada and de for Germany.
Oh wait.
On Sunday, December 22, 2013, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On 12/22/2013 12:58
Hi list,
DNSNMC fixes the authentication problems previously described, and it addresses
all of the problems that with the previously mentioned proposals. It does this
first by combining DNS with Namecoin (NMC), and then by encouraging a “trust
only those you know” policy.5
“Namecoin is an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/12/13 20:49, Greg wrote:
Hi list,
DNSNMC fixes the authentication problems previously described, and
it addresses all of the problems that with the previously mentioned
proposals. It does this first by combining DNS with Namecoin (NMC),
This is my concern as well. Part of the current system is the cost of
entry. If there is no central authority, and all people can simply create
teh domains they want, then there will be the very serious issue of someone
going to the microsoft in that domain name space and not getting microsoft,
On Dec 21, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Eduardo Robles Elvira edu...@gmail.com wrote:
The obvious problem with this is that namecoin doesn't have all the
domain names already registered assigned to the current owners, and
there's no arbitration authority that can prevent domain cibersquatting.
So I
On 12/21/2013 6:38 PM, Kelly John Rose wrote:
This is my concern as well. Part of the current system is the cost of
entry. If there is no central authority, and all people can simply
create teh domains they want, then there will be the very serious
issue of someone going to the microsoft in
