At 10:58 PM 8/13/2002 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
Lately on both of these lists there has been quite some discussion
about TCPA and Palladium, the good, the bad, the ugly, and the
anonymous. :) However there is something that is very much worth
noting, at least about TCPA.
There is nothing
At 05:04 PM 5/29/2002 -0400, Adam Fields wrote:
Hughes, James P says:
Change the billboard for elevator music (which will be protected).
Will you be able to play back your digital dictations *if* they
were recorded in an environment that included background music.
IMHO, Silly does not mean
At 01:14 PM 5/29/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Pete Chown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 8:05 AM
David G. Koontz wrote:
Can you imagine watermarks on billboard advertisements? How
subliminal.
Actually this would be weird. Suppose digital cameras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 03:55 PM 1/26/2002 -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Not wanting to have extended contest over this,
I'm afraid I'm not letting it drop.
but all these absolutes in
the comments are just too
At 09:59 AM 1/17/2002 +0200, Amir Herzberg wrote:
A very important goal of secure commerce is to provide alternate
mechanisms in cyberspace. This is since when a hacker is using
ATT's logo in her website, it may not be feasible for ATT to sue
him (in
particular he may reside in places where logos
.
- Carl
P.S. the workshop where we should (and probably will) be discussing this is
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~pki02/ and there are still two weeks before papers are
due.
++
|Carl Ellison Intel E: [EMAIL PROTECTED
not possible to secure logos. It's a MMOP (mere matter of programming). :)
- Carl
++
|Carl Ellison Intel E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|2111 NE 25th Ave M/S JF3-212 T: +1-503-264-2900 |
|Hillsboro OR 97124
At 05:45 PM 12/26/2001 -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Phillip Hallam-Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Methinks you complain too much.
PKI is in widespread use, it is just not that noticeable when you
use it. This is how it should be. SSL is widely used to secure
internet payment
presumption of
non-repudiation) is anti-consumer, when viewed as a financial
mechanism, and I can't imagine that succeeding even if the vendors
were banks.
- Carl
++
|Carl Ellison Intel E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|2111 NE 25th Ave
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~pki02/cfp.pdf
We're looking for papers to be submitted by the end of January '02
and we're especially interested in papers on the real ways to use
public key technology to solve real problems.
Please pass the word to researchers you know who might not have heard
of
At 08:52 PM 10/16/2001 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ben Laurie writes:
Trei, Peter wrote:
Windows XP at least checks for drivers not signed by MS, but
whose security this promotes is an open question.
Errr ... surely this promotes MS's bottom line and no-one's
At 12:35 AM 10/14/2001 GMT, David Wagner wrote:
Mike Brodhead wrote:
Just about all of the private-sector conferences I have attended
require registration.
I think this is a poor example. I expect you'd be welcome to use
the name 'John Smith' and pay cash, if you like.
Using the name John
Declan,
we already have a national ID card: a passport.
Knowing that some government (or forger) has attached some name to a
picture that looks like the person holding the card gives you some
information about that person, with a non-0 probability. But, is it
the information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 05:26 PM 9/16/2001 +0100, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
Bin-Laden was at one time said to use stego in posted images for
comms.
I heard that restated today on NPR by an ex-FBI commentator.
I think it is ironic that Congress passed a law a while ago
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 07:46 PM 9/14/2001 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand why anyone would choose to vote for an individual
that doesn't understand the above logic.
I wish people voted for people who understood any kind of logic.
As Matt Blaze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 12:23 AM 9/15/2001 -0700, Bram Cohen wrote:
People in cells probably forego electronic communications completely
for highly sensitive information - face to face communication works
fine and doesn't involve anywhere near the risks.
According to
16 matches
Mail list logo
