Peter Gutmann wrote:
> "Ian Farquhar (ifarquha)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> For example: the Gigabyte GA-965QM-DS2 (rev 2.0) which "features security
>> enhancement by TPM". More common (ASUS, Foxconn) was the "TPM Connector",
>> which seemed to be a hedged bet, by replacing the cost of the
"David G. Koontz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>There are third party TPM modules, which could allow some degree of
>standardization:
As I said in my previous message, just because they exist doesn't mean they'll
do anything if you plug them into a MB with the necessary header (assuming you
have a
| ...Apple is one vendor who I gather does include a TPM chip on their
| systems, I gather, but that wasn't useful for me.
Apple included TPM chips on their first round of Intel-based Macs.
Back in 2005, there were all sorts of stories floating around the net
about how Apple would use TPM to preven
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&viewitem=&item=180133437659#6376261103687981571
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe
of possible interest...
Original Message
Subject: [saag] SHA-2 patent status
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:55:46 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of possible interest (but hopefully no concern) to this list: a new
IPR statement from the NSA to the
Forwarded:
From: Radu Sion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: CFP: Financial Cryptography and Data Security 2008 [deadline:
September 25]
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:07:37 -0400
Reply-To: Radu Sion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dear Colleague,
This is an advanced call for papers for the Financial
Cryptography
David G. Koontz writes:
> There are third party TPM modules, which could allow some degree of
> standardization:
>
> http://www.ieiworld.com/en/news_content.asp?id=erbium/projectOBJ00244201&news_cate=News&news_sub_cate=Product
>
> The IEI TPM module is used in their own motherboards and some VIA
>
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:59:55 +1000
"James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many protocols use some form of self describing data format, for
> example ASN.1, XML, S expressions, and bencoding.
>
> Why?
>
> Presumably both ends of the conversation have negotiated what
> protocol version the
> It seems odd for the TPM of all devices to be put on a pluggable module as
> shown here. The whole point of the chip is to be bound tightly to the
> motherboard and to observe the boot and initial program load sequence.
Maybe I am showing my eternal optimist side here, but to me, this is how
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 04:42:56PM +1200, David G. Koontz wrote:
> Apple (mis)uses
> TPM to unsuccessfully prevent OS X from running on non-Apple Hardware.
> All Apple on Intel machines have TPM, that's what 6 percent of new PCs?
To nit pick, the TPM is only present in some Apple Intel
machines
10 matches
Mail list logo
