Paul Hoffman writes:
>Peter, you really need more detents on the knob for your hyperbole setting.
>"nothing happened" is flat-out wrong: the CA fixed the problem and researched
>all related problems that it could find. Perhaps you meant "the CA was not
>punished": that would be correct in this ca
Travis writes:
>I have never seen a good catalog of computationally-strong pseudo-random
>number generators. It seems that everyone tries to roll their own in
>whatever application they are using, and I bet there's a lot of waste and
>inefficiency and re-inventing the wheel involved.
>
>If this
Ben Laurie writes:
>Incidentally, the reason we don't use EKE (and many other useful schemes) is
>not because they don't solve our problems, its because the rights holders
>won't let us use them.
That's not the reason, TLS-SRP isn't that annoyingly encumbered, and even the
totally unencumbered
At 1:02 AM +1200 5/7/09, Peter Gutmann wrote:
>Paul Hoffman writes:
>
>>Peter, you really need more detents on the knob for your hyperbole setting.
>>"nothing happened" is flat-out wrong: the CA fixed the problem and researched
>>all related problems that it could find. Perhaps you meant "the CA w
"Perry E. Metzger" writes:
>Home routers and other equipment last for years. If we slowly roll out
>various protocol and system updates now, then in a number of years, when we
>find ourselves with real trouble, a lot of them will already be updated
>because new ones won't have issues.
I'm not re
