On 9/19/2012 2:17 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I've seen claims that quantum key agreement lets both parties detect a
man in the middle with no prior communication and no trusted third
party. If that's true it would obviously be huge.
Whispering in someone's ear, or, equivalently, near field
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:48 PM, James A. Donald jam...@echeque.com wrote:
On 9/19/2012 2:17 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I've seen claims that quantum key agreement lets both parties detect a
man in the middle with no prior communication and no trusted third
party. If that's true it would
Does anybody here take quantum crypto seriously? Just wondering. I do not
see any benefit over classical methods. If one trusts the entire link and
knows it's not MitM'd in advance, what advantage if any does quantum key
distribution have over ordinary methods? And isn't it just as useless
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Natanael natanae...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anybody here take quantum crypto seriously? Just wondering. I do not
see any benefit over classical methods. If one trusts the entire link and
knows it's not MitM'd in advance, what advantage if any does quantum key
It can detect passive snooping, not full MITM.
- Sent from my tablet
Den 18 sep 2012 18:17 skrev Zack Weinberg zack.weinb...@sv.cmu.edu:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Natanael natanae...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anybody here take quantum crypto seriously? Just wondering. I do not
see any
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Natanael natanae...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anybody here take quantum crypto seriously? Just wondering. I do not
see any benefit over classical methods. If one trusts the entire link and
knows it's not MitM'd in advance, what advantage if any does quantum key
