--- begin forwarded text
Status: RO
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Cory Doctorow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailing-List: list [EMAIL PROTECTED]; contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 05:09:54 -0800
Subject: [Boing Boing Blog] Kismac: WEP cracking for OS X
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- begin forwarded text
Status: RO
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 01:00:19 -0600 (CST)
From: InfoSec News [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ISN] PGP Opens Up Encryption Source Code
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: InfoSec News [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:48 PM -0500 11/29/02, Donald Eastlake 3rd wrote:
Arnold,
If you want to play with this as in intellectual exercise, be my guest.
But the probability of changing the underlying IEEE 802.11i draft
standard, which would take a 3/4 majority of the voting members of IEEE
802.11, or of making
--- begin forwarded text
Status: RO
From: pplf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PGPfreeware 8.0:
I'm not saying there might not be a level of error or weakness that
would cause a emergency reset of the standards process. I'm saying that
this diddle-shit minor DoS attack isn't such an error or weakness. It
was fully known about by the 802.11 working group, repeatedly debated at
great length,
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 03:12:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Robert Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help!
Help!
I need access to a big fast machine ASAP, to count points on a
humongous elliptic curve. That requires running a process that
I suppose that if it's not blinded, or at least functionally anonymous,
like you'd get with statistically-tested streaming cash, it's not *that*
bearer, but, hey, that's just *my* opinion, right?
:-).
I would assume that anything that has accounts with client names on them is
probably not
At 4:06 PM -0800 on 12/3/02, Somebody wrote:
I forgot to ask: who the hell is DMT?
Nobody I ever heard of...
How are they marketing this
stuff -
on a website with only an IP address... :-).
or, who have they gotten to use it thus far?
Nobody I ever heard of...
However, that old
--- begin forwarded text
Status: RO
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 16:06:12 -0800
Subject: Re: DBCs now issued by DMT
From: Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 01:55 PM, Steve Schear wrote:
Digital Monetary Trust now supports
OK, suppose we've got a bank that issues bearer money.
Who owns the bank? It should be owned by bearer shares, of course.
Can any clever person here devise such a protocol?
I'd guess that all the Bank's finances should be available to anyone who
asks. That should include an accounting of all
The fifth beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.7 is now available from the
OpenSSL FTP site URL: ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/. This beta
contains quite a number of fixes since beta 4.
This is NOT a final beta, even if that was the original plan. The
updated plan has beta 6 as final beta. It
OpenSSL version 0.9.6h released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of version
0.9.6h of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS. This new OpenSSL version
is
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, James A. Donald wrote:
Anything that is good, gets ported a lot. Anything that is
ported a lot gets build/port problems.
Actually, I've found the reverse to be true. Anything that gets
ported a lot eventually gets all the portability crap straightened
out so that porting
Arnold G. Reinhold wrote:
If I am right and WPA needlessly
introduces a significant denial of service vulnerability, then it
should be fixed. If I am wrong, no change is needed of course.
But TKIP (the part of WPA you're talking about) is only a
temporary measure, and will soon be replaced by
The answer is multi-fold.
1) The 802.11i standard wont be finished for a while.
2) There is an apparent Market Requirement for something better than
WEP __NOW__.
3) The WPA can only change their requirements once per year, so even
if 802.11i were ready in 3 months, it would still take
If PGP, Inc was going after all seventeen users of gnupg and trying to
convert them, you'd be right. I have the feeling however, that the PGP
crowd would actually like people to use their product.
For all the whining from the 'free beer' crowd, no one had bothered to make
PGP/gnupg compatible
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
OK, suppose we've got a bank that issues bearer money.
Who owns the bank? It should be owned by bearer shares, of course.
Can any clever person here devise such a protocol?
I thought about this problem for several months.
The problem I kept
--
Arnold G. Reinhold
Cryptographic standards should be judged on their merits, not
on the bureaucratic difficulties in changing them. Specs have
been amended before. Even NSA was willing to revise its
original secure hash standard. That's why we have SHA1. If I
am right and WPA
18 matches
Mail list logo
