On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 10:17, Birger Toedtmann wrote:
David Turner schrieb am Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:29:39PM -0500:
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 05:50, Pete Chown wrote:
With DVDs we have a complex situation. Supposedly studios can make more
per film, so they can afford to make more
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 12:36, Trei, Peter wrote:
Dave:
Adam is correct - I was responding to him.
'secure remote attestation that the boot
sequence was followed'
seems to imply that a net connection back
to Hollywood would be required to boot.
That's simply not true. TCPA and
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 05:12, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Anonymous wrote:
Microsoft's point with regard to DRM has always been that Palladium had
other uses besides that one which everyone was focused on. Obviously
Of course it's useful. Does the usefulness outweigh the
Grigg counts the benefits of living in a MITM-protected world (no MITM
attacks recorded), as though they would happen with or without MITM
protection. Is there any reason to believe that's this is, in fact,
true? That is, if zero dollars were spent on MITM protection, would
there still be no
