On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 05:12, Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Anonymous wrote: > > > Microsoft's point with regard to DRM has always been that Palladium had > > other uses besides that one which everyone was focused on. Obviously > > Of course it's useful. Does the usefulness outweigh the support for > special interests (DRM, governments, software monopolies)? There is no > value for the end user which can't be achieved with smart cards, which > have the additional potential of being removable and transportable.
I have my own problems with Pd, but I'm not sure how remote attestation can be achieved without something like Pd or TCPA. And remote attestation is quite useful (although also dangerous) for online gaming, and distributed computing. -- -Dave Turner Stalk Me: 617 441 0668 "On matters of style, swim with the current, on matters of principle, stand like a rock." -Thomas Jefferson --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
