Re: [cryptopp-users] Re: Using Crypto++ to sign using private key; SHA1 vs Whirlpool

2019-01-25 Thread Olli Savolainen
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 2:14:23 AM UTC+2, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:28 AM Olli Savolainen > > wrote: > > > > Oh thanks, that actually seems to work. I had just forgotten the using > directive so it seemed like SHA256 enum value didn't seem to work. > > Just

Re: [cryptopp-users] Re: Using Crypto++ to sign using private key; SHA1 vs Whirlpool

2019-01-24 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:28 AM Olli Savolainen wrote: > > Oh thanks, that actually seems to work. I had just forgotten the using > directive so it seemed like SHA256 enum value didn't seem to work. > Just curious, why is SHA3 different, or have I just messed up somehow? It is probably you, but

Re: [cryptopp-users] Re: Using Crypto++ to sign using private key; SHA1 vs Whirlpool

2019-01-24 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:28 AM Olli Savolainen wrote: > > Oh thanks, that actually seems to work. I had just forgotten the using > directive so it seemed like SHA256 enum value didn't seem to work. > Just curious, why is SHA3 different, or have I just messed up somehow? > Anyway, can I help