Re: [css-d] Why the height of containing block is zero?

2006-05-13 Thread Niklas Kanthak
> Thank your advice. I modified my code to: > > ... > > Hello ray, that's because you've inserted a new div which clears the flow but still has float: right; due to the definition: #header div {float: right;}. So extending the will help, which is not very elegant, better would be creatin

Re: [css-d] Why the height of containing block is zero?

2006-05-13 Thread ray
Thank your advice. I modified my code to: ... but it has no effect. Is it because the header div consists only of floated blocks? I uses Firefox 1.5. On 5/14/06, Philippe Wittenbergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On May 14, 2006, at 10:16 AM, ray wrote: > > > I write the following code:

Re: [css-d] Making a mess, navigation and footer weirdness.

2006-05-13 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Mark Fellowes wrote: > Not sure what I'm doing wrong . As suggested earlier I've removed > the heights from the content1 and content2 divs but the side nav is > still off (except for IE). > Relevant page: http://pamshop.com/Template1/exp8.html# Small changes in source-code and CSS will make al

Re: [css-d] Why the height of containing block is zero?

2006-05-13 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On May 14, 2006, at 10:16 AM, ray wrote: > I write the following code: > xhtml: > > > Welcome to site > > site in English > hello,please login or href="">register > > > > > css: > #header { > ba

[css-d] Why the height of containing block is zero?

2006-05-13 Thread ray
I write the following code: xhtml: Welcome to site site in English hello,please login or register css: #header { background-color: #FFE4B5; } #header h1 { float: left; margin: 0; } #header

Re: [css-d] Making a mess, navigation and footer weirdnes s.

2006-05-13 Thread Mark Fellowes
 Oh, sorry. I did mean: just delete the float:left over there. In css, the /* */ means: "between this is a comment; browsers, don't use it as css-rule". When I'm trying things and don't want to get rid of the version before, I place the /* and the */ before and after the part I guess I do

Re: [css-d] Making a mess, navigation and footer weirdness.

2006-05-13 Thread francky
Mark Fellowes wrote: > > Francky wrote: > > > > >> Hi Mark, > >> For the sidenav, did you try: > > > > >>#wrapper #linkcontainer { /* float: left; */ } > > > I didn't try it with the /**/. I will as soon as I get back to my > desktop. Does the comments mean something different then float:left

Re: [css-d] Making a mess, navigation and footer weirdnes s.

2006-05-13 Thread Mark Fellowes
I didn't try it with the /**/. I will as soon as I get back to my desktop. Does the comments mean something different then float:left ? Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 7:17 PM -07:00 To: Mark Fellowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: CSS List [EMAIL

Re: [css-d] Making a mess, navigation and footer weirdness.

2006-05-13 Thread francky
Mark Fellowes wrote: >Not sure what I'm doing wrong . As suggested earlier I've removed the heights >from the content1 and content2 divs but the side nav is still off (except for >IE). Also the footer doesn't seem to want to move. > >Relevant page: >http://pamshop.com/Template1/exp8.html# >[.

Re: [css-d] Mysterious margin-top I didn't ask for (firefox only)

2006-05-13 Thread francky
Gaz Newt wrote: >In firefox my centred fixed-width 2 column layout has a mysterious margin at >the top of the header. When I add a border to the header the margin-top >disappears and it looks the same as ie (flush with the top). But without >theborder (how I want it) the margin re-appears. > >C

[css-d] Mysterious margin-top I didn't ask for (firefox only)

2006-05-13 Thread Gaz Newt
In firefox my centred fixed-width 2 column layout has a mysterious margin at the top of the header. When I add a border to the header the margin-top disappears and it looks the same as ie (flush with the top). But without theborder (how I want it) the margin re-appears. Can anyone help? Here's

Re: [css-d] Problem rendering in firefox 1.0.4.

2006-05-13 Thread Niklas Kanthak
> My question is: is this a bug in Firefox, or in my incorrect > understanding of the css positioning? Hello Bill, I can't really answer your question, but it seems that width: 100%; height: 100%; within the .popup div {} declaration caused the movement. Furthermore, I seems that the within th

Re: [css-d] Firefox problem: Forces 100% width on a floated element

2006-05-13 Thread Bill Brown
> On 5/13/06, Bill Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www.pixelmech.com/rev/test.html > > > > The CSS is inline. The class/element in question is > > .float-left-half inside the #help-titlebar. > > Add a width of 99% to #help-titlebar (since you have

Re: [css-d] Firefox problem: Forces 100% width on a floated element

2006-05-13 Thread Tom Dell'Aringa
On 5/13/06, Bill Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www.pixelmech.com/rev/test.html > > > > The CSS is inline. The class/element in question is > > .float-left-half inside the #help-titlebar. > > Add a width of 99% to #help-titlebar (since you have 4px padding). You'll > need to adjust t

Re: [css-d] Firefox problem: Forces 100% width on a floated element

2006-05-13 Thread Bill Brown
> I have a strange problem I have never seen before. I have two > floated elements inside another floated element. The two in > question are floated left and right with widths of 48% - > effectively giving me two columns, one thing on the left, one > thing on the right. > > The problem is in F

Re: [css-d] Text over image in IE

2006-05-13 Thread Erik Gyepes
Hi! Thanks for your reply. I know that this code is really messy, I really not enjoy it. It is generated by WYSIWYG editor in CMS of company which this page is. I know XHTML and CSS quite good but I really dont like to work on project which was made before me by someone else, but now I must to f

Re: [css-d] Text over image in IE

2006-05-13 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Erik Gyepes wrote: > Look here: http://pripisa.sk/stranka/oddych-vo-vode/ ... why is the > text over image in IE? In FF is everything allright. Can my anyone > help? 1: you have triggered 'hasLayout'[1] on the paragraphs. Cleaning up and restyling those paragraphs, which includes getting rid of

[css-d] 2 columns with borders plus a footer that sticks to the bottom of the viewport

2006-05-13 Thread Erik Visser
What i'am trying to achieve is: - a 2 columns layout with vertical borders where the 2 columns stretch to the bottom of the viewport (even when both columns only have one or 2 lines of text) - combined with a footer that sticks to the bottom of the viewport i started almost a half year ago and i

Re: [css-d] IE problem using graphic as underline > Article updated !

2006-05-13 Thread francky
francky wrote: >Article/tutorial "Fun links in css (Underline with IE-proof home made >text-decoration)": >http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/imaging/fun-links.html >... and don't laugh! ;-) > > I asked it, so I got it... Els wrote me within an hour: > :-)I tried not to, but on a de

[css-d] Firefox problem: Forces 100% width on a floated element

2006-05-13 Thread Tom Dell'Aringa
I have a strange problem I have never seen before. I have two floated elements inside another floated element. The two in question are floated left and right with widths of 48% - effectively giving me two columns, one thing on the left, one thing on the right. The problem is in Firefox, the right

[css-d] Making a mess, navigation and footer weirdness.

2006-05-13 Thread Mark Fellowes
Not sure what I'm doing wrong . As suggested earlier I've removed the heights from the content1 and content2 divs but the side nav is still off (except for IE). Also the footer doesn't seem to want to move. Relevant page: http://pamshop.com/Template1/exp8.html# Navigation css: http://pamsho

[css-d] Text over image in IE

2006-05-13 Thread Erik Gyepes
Hello. Look here: http://pripisa.sk/stranka/oddych-vo-vode/ ... why is the text over image in IE? In FF is everything allright. Can my anyone help? Thanks, Erik __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman

Re: [css-d] Almost have it...except!!!!

2006-05-13 Thread Dave Goodchild
> > > > >> http://www.lorettosedgwick.org > >> The lower three lists should be going across the page instead of going > >> vertically down the page. > >> > >> Even the CSS and HTML validate :-) > > http://www.dlaakso.com/gustave/ Does this help? 1. add clear: left to .lowerlinksbox to arrang

[css-d] VisualisingCSSusingVRML

2006-05-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi I added http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=VisualisingCSSusingVRML but I guess I need to announce the page on here for anyone to know about it... For your convenience, here's the text of that page: Anyone know of a way to generate a VRML model of a CSS design? Some css models are really ha

Re: [css-d] Almost have it...except!!!!

2006-05-13 Thread David Laakso
David Laakso wrote: > Dave Pierce wrote: > >> http://www.lorettosedgwick.org >> The lower three lists should be going across the page instead of going >> vertically down the page. >> >> Even the CSS and HTML validate :-) >> >> > Validate the css and the lists will jump into place i

Re: [css-d] Almost have it...except!!!!

2006-05-13 Thread David Laakso
Dave Pierce wrote: > http://www.lorettosedgwick.org > The lower three lists should be going across the page instead of going > vertically down the page. > > Even the CSS and HTML validate :-) > Validate the css and the lists will jump into place in ie. > Dave > ~dL -- http://www.dlaak

Re: [css-d] Almost have it...except!!!!

2006-05-13 Thread Els
Dave Pierce wrote: > OK the home page almost works...well it does in all 5 of my Mac > browsers, and even in Firefox for PC, but of course it doesn't > in IE/Win. Just one more thing to fix, and I'll be daed if > I can find the problem. I beseech you to take a look at > http://www.lorettosedgwi