Marje Cannon wrote:
For some reason, the values within the form fields are too high in FF, but
not IE... does anyone have a clue why this is happening.
http://www.webdesignsarasota.com/contact.php
The stylesheet is located here
Here is something interesting (Operating System is
Win XP 2002 Svp 2):
First open http://www.putti.no in IE 7.0, you should
see a page that displays OK.
Now, clean cache, cookies, etc and open the page in
FF 2.0.0.10 or FF 2.0.0.11. You will notice that
the menu is not displaying properly
At 02:07 AM 12/1/2007, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
No typo, but rather a reaction to the lowest common denominator
design-approach I responded to. I rarely ever see sites the way they are
designed - stable or not. I don't expect them to, and the mentioned
approach doesn't help one bit on the end-result.
Thanks Georg. I did check that, and set my width to auto (it was 100%)
and it didn't make any difference.
In summary, I have a shell div, which contains a header, menu, and content
div. In the print style sheet, I set the menu and header to none. I was
focusing my print efforts on the
On Dec 1, 2007, at 11:56 PM, Jan Christian Anker wrote:
http://www.putti.no
Now, clean cache, cookies, etc and open the page in
FF 2.0.0.10 or FF 2.0.0.11. You will notice that
the menu is not displaying properly (main menu line
above display area, only partly visible).
Happens, yes. But
Subject: Re: [css-d] site-check please, major ie6 issues
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
http://www.bildas.fatpawdesign.com/index.html
Probably too much 'hasLayout' for IE6' liking already :-)
IE6 seems to have serious stacking-problems, and there's too many
'stacking-correctors' in there too.
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Curiosity killed the cat...
-- Molly 'the cat' :-)
Don't worry, they have lives to spare :)
[···]
Content being the same doesn't mean users get to or want to see it in
the same way across the board, and that is often the reason why users
learn about
I hope this time will work :)
goerge wrote:
I think someone is defining site stability on the wrong premises
Well if you are refering it to me, First of all I never did define site
stability.I did define Layout stability though. Now let me give you an
example tomake it clear what the
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
http://www.bildas.fatpawdesign.com/index.html
Made change as recommended. Would appreciate another check.
Working just fin in IE6 (on w2k).
Can I just take out those particular 'position' declarations out all
together?
Yes, that _should_ automatically take it back
I am about to revamp a long form I created a while ago and I want to
use CSS to style it. This will be my first form styled with CSS.
Does anyone have any good online resources they can point me to that
show how to do this?
I have a book that briefly talks about it but apparently IE6 doesn't
DAVOUD TOHIDY wrote:
I think someone is defining site stability on the wrong
premises
Well if you are refering it to me, I never did define site
stability.
I was _only_ referring to arguments and wording in the mail I responded
to. Erik H. used your response as base for his
Hi Tina,
Give Stu Nichols CSS Play a shot:
http://www.cssplay.co.uk/menu/form on this page
underneath the form, there are other links to
different styles done to forms by other
designer/authors.
Elli
--- Yoyo Etc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am about to revamp a long form I created a while
Rafael wrote:
Maybe we're talking about different things here. What I understand
here would be basically the same as saying that the standards
shouldn't exist and, though interpreting the same content /
instructions, each browser should render it its own way.
Standards are defined for
Erik Harris wrote:
Your advice is _generally_ true, since browsers _generally_ ignore
stuff they don't understand, but extreme examples like the Acid
Stress Test show that your advice doesn't _always_ hold. If you get
fancy enough with standards-compliant code, some browsers won't
On Nov 30, 2007 2:57 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Ettinger wrote:
http://chovy.dyndns.org/test/img/tab.html
I'm trying to accomplish Good, but am only able to get Bad as
shown in the link above.
I'm looking for a bullet proof method, that will not insert a gap
At 05:09 PM 12/1/2007, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
So, I would give browsers a complete Acid Stress Test, and hide same
test from weaker browser and provide them with an alternative.
Aside from MSIE, how do you do this? You can use the MS-proprietary
commented if statements to provide alternate
on Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 20:55:44 +0100 George wrote:
One type of building - mostly rigid ones, yes...
Well it seems now you are talking about an environment
that I know :) .
But no you are absolutely wrong. It does not matter If a
building is flexible or rigid, it will have a structure
DAVOUD TOHIDY wrote:
on Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 20:55:44 +0100 George wrote:
One type of building - mostly rigid ones, yes...
Well it seems now you are talking about an environment
that I know :) .
Well, that's nice. But frankly, you and your environment bore me.
Do you
- Original Message -
From: DAVOUD TOHIDY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, December 1, 2007 9:03 pm
Subject: Re: [css-d] How will firefox 3 affect web developers?
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
The differences at the moment seems to be one of presenting a
buildingstructure (design) in
Erik Harris wrote:
At 05:09 PM 12/1/2007, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
So, I would give browsers a complete Acid Stress Test, and hide
same test from weaker browser and provide them with an alternative.
Aside from MSIE, how do you do this? You can use the MS-proprietary
commented if statements
20 matches
Mail list logo
