At 21:50 -0700 5/2/08, Geoffrey Hoffman wrote:
I installed Office 2007 on my box at work and really like some of the new
fonts that came with it.
http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/a-comprehensive-look-at-the-new-microsoft-fonts/
Anyone know if you can buy them separately somewhere? (I really don't
Gunlaug,
In your article at http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_additions_13.html you
make a comment of...
re-triggering the bug.
Note that this IE-bug can be re-triggered if font-size keywords are
used anywhere in a document. The bug is then inherited by the children of
the element in
On Wed, February 6, 2008 1:44 pm, Rob Emenecker wrote:
re-triggering the bug.
Note that this IE-bug can be re-triggered if font-size keywords are
used anywhere in a document. The bug is then inherited by the children of
the element in question, and IE is on it again.
So, you've
Rob Emenecker wrote:
Gunlaug,
In your article at http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_additions_13.html you
make a comment of...
re-triggering the bug.
Note that this IE-bug can be re-triggered if font-size keywords are
used anywhere in a document. The bug is then inherited by the
Thanks Nick and Gunlaug,
That clarifies things. I never use absolute or relative keywords for
font-sizing. I only use measurements, and then try to stick with ems, with a
100% as a base declaration on the HTML element. I just wasn't sure what was
considered keywords. Thanks for the link to the
Hello List,
Not sure if this would fall under off topic. But I
wanted to know what the reasons are for using a strict
doc type as opposed to transitional. I use strict in
my documents but wondered why it seems to be a bad
idea to go with transitional as I've seen a couple of
topics graze the
I am looking for a basic tabbed hover over based content selection example.
Like :-
http://www.authorize.net
Many thanks in advance,
Aaron
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:40:53 +, Krystian - Sunlust wrote:
Here is the Link
http://www.coloursense.net/testfolder/
Nice. However, increasing text size, or at default text size on my laptop,
the
horizontal menu breaks into two lines. Still usable, though.
It is a nice website indeed, I
Elli Vizcaino wrote:
Not sure if this would fall under off topic.
It's on-topic as far as it relates to practical use of CSS.
But I
wanted to know what the reasons are for using a strict
doc type as opposed to transitional.
The use of a Transitional vs. Strict doctype declaration, as
If you are starting out using a Strict doctype, then there really is no
issue with regards to CSS and rendering. On the other hand, if you are
migrating from Transitional to Strict, and altering pages so that they
validate, watch out for an attribute selectors in your CSS that might be
orphaned.
Aaron,
A number of various drop-down menus are demonstrated here:
http://www.cssplay.co.uk/menus/
If you use Dreamweaver check the offerings for sale by Project Seven here:
http://www.projectseven.com/products/menusystems/index.htm
Also, Project Seven has a good article on accessibility and
At 09:46 -0800 6/2/08, Elli Vizcaino wrote:
Hello List,
Not sure if this would fall under off topic. But I
wanted to know what the reasons are for using a strict
doc type as opposed to transitional. I use strict in
my documents but wondered why it seems to be a bad
idea to go with transitional as
Not the menu the tabs lower down on the bottom of the page.
Thanks anyway,
Aaron
- Original Message -
From: Jim Davis
To: Aaron Gray
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Hover over tabbed selection
Aaron,
The w3 validator clearly is not compatible with Microsoft ASP.NET code.
Here is an example - http://www.cargovango.com/start.aspx. All of the
code that it flags is generated at run time. It's nothing that a
developer adds.
It's annoying because I can never say that the code is Valid XHTML 1.0
Yes, I've encountered this before with PHP. You have to get into the source
code and fix it. It's not about what the developer adds. It's about
tweaking the ASP (or PHP or JSP or ColdFusion or PERL) code so that it spits
out valid XHTML.
As the standardista/validatorian of the company I work for, I also have
this problem. However, if you google for it, you will find that there
is a way to change the default output HTML from asp.net - it's pretty
technical, but it is possible.
- Jon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Actually, I stand corrected. The validator is flagging the link to a
Spanish translator site:
a
href=http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?hl=enie=utf-8oe=utf-8langpair=en|esu=http://www.cargovango.com/prev=/language_tools;
The code generated by .NET is clean:
input type=hidden name=__VIEWSTATE
Rob,
There are some elements of .NET output a developer has no control over.
For example, this source code:
asp:DataList ID=featuredVehicleList2 RepeatColumns=3
RepeatDirection=Horizontal runat=server
ItemTemplate
a href=/VehicleDetails.aspx?id=%#DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem,
The code generated by .NET is clean:
input type=hidden name=__EVENTVALIDATION
id=__EVENTVALIDATION
value=/wEWEAKO/p/dAwKq3vLOBAKq3vLOBAL2xbW7DAKAiqHADgKK4PtQAuz/jNYFApfy
9JYFAqj0rMEKAru0guIEAqXDn9gHAob7rXYC3KT34AsC6rHbuwQCztGz6wgChp+xBcqi3H1
EuMYmueRpk+PhihUbpA7p
/
Not sure what
The w3 validator clearly is not compatible with Microsoft ASP.NET
code.
Here is an example - http://www.cargovango.com/start.aspx. All of the
code that it flags is generated at run time. It's nothing that a
developer adds.
That's one way to spin it!
It's probably more accurate to say
There are some elements of .NET output a developer has no control
over.
For example, this source code:
asp:DataList
Well, a developer can choose NOT to use a DataList. That said, that
somewhat defeats the RAD concepts of using ASP.net + VS.net to whip out
code.
In ASP.net 1.1 I ended up
This is what I was after :-
http://www.cssplay.co.uk/menu/one_page.html
Aaron
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
At 13:40 -0800 6/2/08, Big Moxy wrote:
The w3 validator clearly is not compatible with Microsoft ASP.NET code.
Here is an example - http://www.cargovango.com/start.aspx. All of the
code that it flags is generated at run time. It's nothing that a
developer adds.
It's annoying because I can never
At 13:40 -0800 6/2/08, Big Moxy wrote:
The w3 validator clearly is not compatible with Microsoft ASP.NET
code.
Here is an example - http://www.cargovango.com/start.aspx. All of the
code that it flags is generated at run time. It's nothing that a
developer adds.
Too bad their couldn't be
On Feb 6, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Alex Robinson wrote:
At 13:40 -0800 6/2/08, Big Moxy wrote:
The w3 validator clearly is not compatible with Microsoft ASP.NET
code.
Here is an example - http://www.cargovango.com/start.aspx. All of
the
code that it flags is generated at run time. It's nothing
Hi All,
I'm puzzled by the appearance of 4 addition hr in the Featured Vehicle
section of http://www.cargovango.com/Inventory/Default.aspx. This is
common code and the problem doesn't show up elsewhere.
The css is at http://www.cargovango.com/css/cvgweb.css
Any insights are greatly
Div id=sales has 4 of them inside it.
Get Firefox, install Firebug, click Tools -- Firebug -- Open Firebug,
click the Inspect tab and then hover over the various elements on your page.
On Feb 6, 2008 7:56 PM, Big Moxy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I'm puzzled by the appearance of
Your id=sales div has five of them stacked in/around the UL lists. The
first one appears under the text. The remaining four are partially obscured
by the photos in the sales div, and just show partially into the right-hand
column.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:46 -0800 on 02/06/2008, Elli Vizcaino wrote about [css-d]
Transitional Vs. Strict Doctype:
Hello List,
Not sure if this would fall under off topic. But I
wanted to know what the reasons are for using a strict
doc type as opposed to transitional. I use strict in
my documents but wondered
Big Moxy wrote:
Hi All,
I'm puzzled by the appearance of 4 addition hr in the Featured Vehicle
section of http://www.cargovango.com/Inventory/Default.aspx. This is
common code and the problem doesn't show up elsewhere.
The css is at http://www.cargovango.com/css/cvgweb.css
Any insights
David,
I was tasked with converting a static site to database driven and wasn't
approved for the time necessary to rework all existing code. :-$I
did what I could and am now just trying to cleanup what I didn't do
right. The original code was a disaster and I didn't want to donate the
Bob Rosenberg wrote:
Aside from the different treatment of CSS with the two Doctypes,
There is no different treatment, as I mentioned in my reply. The
difference arises when you omit, against the HTML rules, the URL from a
Transitional doctype declaration.
the simplistic answer is that if
32 matches
Mail list logo
