From: "Tarah - Dome Cleaning, Inc."
>Also the site has "<%...@language="JAVASCRIPT" CODEPAGE="65001"%>" above the
>header and the header bar is moved in firefox - but again not with explorer.
>Help!
I'm not sure (other than removing it, what you should do about the bit of code
that's above yo
Carolyn Rosner wrote:
> I find it helpful as a designer and web-page reader to see acronyms
> (or initialisms, as I understand the proper term to be for non-'word'
> abbreviations) spelled out each time. My question is: is the use of
> deprecated, or is it still OK to use? Is it accessible?
>
Pr
Tony Zanella wrote:
> http://xtf.lib.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=2005_Q4_3/uvaBook/tei/z00175.xml
> In ie6, the is far lower down on the page
> than in Firefox, and in ie7, the same div "jumps" over to the right.
Problematic to diagnose and correct a layout that is based on tables,
multipl
Also the site has "<%...@language="JAVASCRIPT" CODEPAGE="65001"%>" above the
header and the header bar is moved in firefox - but again not with explorer.
Help!
From: Tarah - Dome Cleaning, Inc.
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 12:59 PM
To: 'css-d@lists.css-discuss.org'
Cc: Tarah - Dome Cleaning, In
Hello all,
I've been assigned a bug fix, and I wanted to check my instincts to
see if I'm on the right track, as css is rather new to me.
The page in question:
http://xtf.lib.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=2005_Q4_3/uvaBook/tei/z00175.xml
This renders fine in Firefox, but problematically in ie6
I find it helpful as a designer and web-page reader to see acronyms (or
initialisms, as I understand the proper term to be for non-'word'
abbreviations) spelled out each time. My question is: is the use of
deprecated, or is it still OK to use? Is it accessible?
I do my acronyms/initialisms thi
I believe it could be a stacking issue, I have gotten the links to work now the
only problem is the image is hiding behind my, I don't know how to word it the
center block on my page :)
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:39 AM "Martyn Merrett"
wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
> There are already several responses
What I don't understand is when I entered in 24% for the right value in firebug
it's position with the margin was perfect now when I enter that
value into my code it's too big, argggh.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:47 AM "Michael Grosch" wrote:
>The syntax is incorrect. It should be
>
> xyz {
>
Oh, I tried it and I so far it appears that it works so all I was missing was
to tell the tag to be {display: block} and it had to be
the height and width of the #logomiddle. I've tried to make the link size
smaller by going as low as 200px but then it just doesn't work, I'm going to
see if I
Sorry, I don't follow and is there a major difference ?
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:22 PM "Jack Timmons" wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Christopher R > wrote:
>
> > HTML:
> >
> > /* coka cola
> > is just a test URL */
> >
>
> You shouldn't be bothering with positioning. Move your span
After just commenting on that, you have given me my answer Tim :) So can you
mix percentages and pixels ? So far I am and seems to be working fine!
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:57 AM "Tim Climis" wrote:
>On Monday, April 6, 2009 7:08:13 pm Christopher R wrote:
> > I used FireBugs layout method to
Hi Chris,
What you've done there is partially correct (the HTML is fine).
However, in the CSS you've made the #logomiddle have it's dimensions
(960x1150px) but the A tag is empty.
You'd need to do something like this:
CSS:
#logomiddle {
display: block;
background: url(header-web-page-graphic-d
Hi Chris,
There are already several responses to this problem on your previous
post "[css-d] CSS Problem with tags on IE 6\7".
I still firmly believe it's something to do with your stacking issues.
Ta,
~Mx
http://www.mxdx.co.uk
___
Sorry for copy, just CC to list.
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Stephen Tang wrote:
>
>> The actual bug appears here:
>
>> http://www.realsimple.com/food-recipes/shopping-storing/beverages/best-coffee-008163/index.html
>>
>> In the right column, there is a lin
14 matches
Mail list logo
