A client handed over to me a site that had just awful code (the original
http://www.inspiredcre8tions.com/red/) and I cleaned it up, made it more
semantic and validated it http://www.language-works.com/RED/indexNEW.htm
but she is griping because now the images and the footer wrap under if you
Anne E. Shroeder wrote:
A client handed over to me a site that had just awful code (the original
http://www.inspiredcre8tions.com/red/) and I cleaned it up, made it more
semantic and validated it http://www.language-works.com/RED/indexNEW.htm
but she is griping because now the images and
On 8/07/2009, at 12:49 PM, Anne E. Shroeder wrote:
A client handed over to me a site that had just awful code (the
original
http://www.inspiredcre8tions.com/red/) and I cleaned it up, made it
more
semantic and validated it http://www.language-works.com/RED/indexNEW.htm
but she is
Are there devices out there that actually use this media type?
Thanks,
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
2009/7/7 Tri-State AdVantage k...@tristateadvantage.com:
I cannot get this page to read correctly in Firefox.
http://www.hcam.net/posts.html
The obvious first thing to fix is the Doctype. HTML 4.01 Transitional
with no URL triggers Quirks Mode, which introduces all sorts of
inconsistencies
On Jul 8, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Ingo Chao wrote:
Are there devices out there that actually use this media type?
Was't there a device made by Microsoft that allowed to use a standard
tv to browse the web? I think it used @media tv. It is/was mostly used
by pensioners in Florida, iirc the joke
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Was't there a device made by Microsoft
that allowed to use a standard tv to
browse the web?
It is Microsoft Web TV (http://www.webtv.com/pc/) which is still out there but
don't know what the user base would be. Try MSDN and/or Technet for an SDK for
this
Was't there a device made by Microsoft that allowed to use a standard
tv to browse the web?
MSN tv formerly Web TV. http://msntv.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
Using images for the borders may work in FF/3.0.11. And might provide a
more stable layout in which the columns are of more consistent width.
Checked in IE 6/7/8 and Mac browsers. Please see:
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/mem-1.html
Thanks a million once again,
I will keep it. (but,
Hello,
Without .js, is there a way to establish a rule in CSS that says:
All h1 that are followed by a p will have a padding-bottom of X.
Is this possible?
Thanks a lot,
Márcio
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
At 15:55 +0100 on 07/08/2009, David Dorward wrote about Re: [css-d]
firefox problem:
The second thing to deal with is the syntax errors:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hcam.net%2Fposts.htmlcharset=%28detect+automatically%29doctype=Inlinegroup=0
Once you've dealt with the
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:20 PM, MEMtal...@gmail.com wrote:
All h1 that are followed by a p will have a padding-bottom of X.
Is this possible?
No, but you could apply the reverse:
h1 + p { padding-top: 3em; }
So instead of any h1 that precedes a p you're styling any p that
immediately
MEM wrote:
Hello,
Without .js, is there a way to establish a rule in CSS that says:
All h1 that are followed by a p will have a padding-bottom of X.
Is this possible?
Thanks a lot,
Márcio
__
css-discuss
No, but you could apply the reverse:
h1 + p { padding-top: 3em; }
So instead of any h1 that precedes a p you're styling any p that
immediately follows an h1. (Note, this doesn't work for IE6. And for
it to work properly in IE7, you'll want to make sure that you never
have a comment
I cannot get this page to read correctly in Firefox.
http://www.hcam.net/posts.html
I got it to work correctly in Explorer by putting a wide border on
the right
hand side of the photo so that the discription is pushed below the
photo.
You mention a wide 'border' but what I see is a 750px
15 matches
Mail list logo
