i know i have a lot of mistakes.
please ignore anything that will not fix or help me.
look at this page in Firefox and then in IE i want the page to look exactly
like it does in Firefox.
the site is actually already published.
princesslimousine.net
the link to the css file is
2009/10/30 Ed Goodson e...@copywritecolombia.com:
I have the same name for different deivs whihc works
… up until the point where you start using getElementById or linking
to the element.
What is the way around this without having to call my divs
different names?
Use classes when you want
2009/10/31 andre petyan andrepet...@yahoo.com:
i know i have a lot of mistakes.
please ignore anything that will not fix or help me.
Sometimes it is hard to know which errors are directly contributing to
a problem and which are not. It is better to fix errors when they are
spotted.
The biggest
At 12:29 PM -0400 10/30/09, Nancy Johnson wrote:
Can some one point me to a css-based verticle menu that expands with a
hover, yet is keyboard accessible? It can also use jquery or
javascript.
Thanks in advance
Nancy
Nancy:
http://webbytedd.com/ccc/accordion-v/
It's based upon jQuery.
(this was initially sent to the individual, not the list. sorry.)
Begin forwarded message:
From: Charles Miller chuckmil...@new.rr.com
Date: October 31, 2009 9:23:46 AM CDT
To: David Dorward dorw...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [css-d] hello this is my first post i just can get this
to look
2009/10/31 Charles Miller chuckmil...@new.rr.com:
Would you mind commenting on why HTML 4.01 Strict? And what the differences
are? This interests me.
Transitional is (more or less) Strict + Legacy junk that should be avoided.
HTML is better supported than XHTML. (Since Internet Explorer
David Dorward wrote:
2009/10/31 Charles Miller chuckmil...@new.rr.com:
Would you mind commenting on why HTML 4.01 Strict? And what the differences
are? This interests me.
Transitional is (more or less) Strict + Legacy junk that should be avoided.
HTML is better supported than
On Nov 1, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Brian Hazelton wrote:
I generally use xhtml 1.0 strict and find it to be very consistent
with
internet explorer 6+ and find that I employ very little if any
workarounds for internet explorer so I tend to disagree that html
works
better than xhtml. What I
