On Nov 1, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Brian Hazelton wrote:
> I generally use xhtml 1.0 strict and find it to be very consistent
> with
> internet explorer 6+ and find that I employ very little if any
> workarounds for internet explorer so I tend to disagree that html
> works
> better than xhtml. What
David Dorward wrote:
> 2009/10/31 Charles Miller :
>
>
>> Would you mind commenting on why HTML 4.01 Strict? And what the differences
>> are? This interests me.
>>
>
> Transitional is (more or less) Strict + Legacy junk that should be avoided.
>
> HTML is better supported than XHTML. (Since
2009/10/31 Charles Miller :
> Would you mind commenting on why HTML 4.01 Strict? And what the differences
> are? This interests me.
Transitional is (more or less) Strict + Legacy junk that should be avoided.
HTML is better supported than XHTML. (Since Internet Explorer doesn't
support XHTML, you
(this was initially sent to the individual, not the list. sorry.)
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Charles Miller
> Date: October 31, 2009 9:23:46 AM CDT
> To: David Dorward
> Subject: Re: [css-d] hello this is my first post i just can get this
> to look right in IE-any
>
>
> On Oct 31, 2009,
At 12:29 PM -0400 10/30/09, Nancy Johnson wrote:
>Can some one point me to a css-based verticle menu that expands with a
>hover, yet is keyboard accessible? It can also use jquery or
>javascript.
>
>Thanks in advance
>
>Nancy
Nancy:
http://webbytedd.com/ccc/accordion-v/
It's based upon jQuery.
2009/10/31 andre petyan :
> i know i have a lot of mistakes.
> please ignore anything that will not fix or help me.
Sometimes it is hard to know which errors are directly contributing to
a problem and which are not. It is better to fix errors when they are
spotted.
The biggest problem you have is
2009/10/30 Ed Goodson :
> I have the same name for different deivs whihc works
… up until the point where you start using getElementById or linking
to the element.
> What is the way around this without having to call my divs
> different names?
Use classes when you want to represent a group of s