Can we please bottom post or comment inline (like below).
Theresa Mesa wrote:
How is it inefficient to add html {height: 100.1%} to your CSS, which
immediately applies this to all pages without so much as a how-do-you-do
(since you are using an external style sheet)? To me, if you like the
How is it inefficient to add html {height: 100.1%} to your CSS, which
immediately applies this to all pages without so much as a how-do-you-
I believe using overflow-y:scroll is a bit better as it does not create a
scroll bar per se.
--
Regards,
Thierry
www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org |
I'll have to try this...
On Jun 3, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I believe using overflow-y:scroll is a bit better as it does not create a
scroll bar per se.
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
Matthew P. Johnson | Eco I.T.
320 Warwick Avenue Oakland CA 94610 | 415.254.1563 | ecoitsf.com
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Thierry
I have a class with position:relative on the 'a' tag, then absolute on
the hover state. The positioning doesn't work correctly in either FF
or Chrome. Works fine in every other browser. Haven't been able to
find any possible reason in my Google searches thus far. Anyone else
experience
Ar 03/06/10 19:51, ysgrifennodd Greg Smith :
I have a class with position:relative on the 'a' tag, then absolute on
the hover state. The positioning doesn't work correctly in either FF
or Chrome. Works fine in every other browser. Haven't been able to
find any possible reason in my Google
I have a class with position:relative on the 'a' tag, then absolute on
the hover state. The positioning doesn't work correctly in either FF
or Chrome. Works fine in every other browser. Haven't been able to
find any possible reason in my Google searches thus far. Anyone else
experience
Ar 03/06/10 20:09, ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley :
The validator gives 117 errors, Greg. I guess that this means that
different browsers are going to try to recover in different ways. They
don't look too hard to cure. Many of them are to do with the product
table you've included as a comment.
On Jun 3, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I have a class with position:relative on the 'a' tag, then absolute
on
the hover state. The positioning doesn't work correctly in either FF
or Chrome. Works fine in every other browser. Haven't been able to
find any possible reason in my
On Jun 3, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Peter Bradley wrote:
Ar 03/06/10 20:09, ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley :
The validator gives 117 errors, Greg. I guess that this means that
different browsers are going to try to recover in different ways.
They
don't look too hard to cure. Many of them are to
Just seen Microsoft's own Cross-browser Test Results Summary and it has
scored 100% in everything! Now this must be an improvement! the test result
is for IE9 so don't get carried away soon.
http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/ietestcenter/
hth
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 9:28 AM
To: 'Theresa Mesa'; 'Matthew P. Johnson'
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] interesting nav issue
Hey, I'm loving this fix, too.
Theresa
PERFECT THANK YOU :)
This does create a space where the scroll bar would be but it makes sense to
me to have an inactive scroll bar per se rather than a scroll bar that does
not view additional page information.
Cheers :)
13 matches
Mail list logo